Some historical and global examples of tax resistance → religious groups and the religious perspective → British Nonconformists → Early 20th Century resistance to publicly-funded sectarian schools → Arthur O’Connor

We’re now in of our survey of the newspaper coverage of the “passive resistance” campaign against taxpayer-funded sectarian education in Britain.

To start off with, a brief article from the Gloucester Citizen:

Passive Resistance.

M.P.’s Presentation Watch Sold.

Among the goods disposed of on at a sale of effects seized from passive resisters at Tettenhall was a gold presentation watch belonging to Mr. C.E. Shaw, M.P. for Stafford. The watch was purchased by Mr. Shaw’s coachman for £7.

The Bishop of Bath and Wells published a compromise proposal in the London Times — something similar to the “peace tax fund” proposal that often gets floated in war tax resistance circles:

  1. Let a clearing house (of the nature of a railway clearing house) be established in connection with the Board of Education.
  2. To this clearing house let every county and local authority notify with regularity the amount of rate it is intending to levy for primary schools; specifying how much of this is required for provided or Council schools, and how much for non-provided or voluntary schools.
  3. Let each ratepayer who is conscientiously opposed to paying any rate towards the support of voluntary schools be allowed (on making a declaration to this effect) to earmark his rate “for the support of provided schools only.”
  4. Let the amount thus earmarked be notified also to the clearing house.
  5. An adjustment of the rates levied in different localities can be easily made at the clearing house; so that, however numerous might be the strained consciences in some districts, a transference of rate-payers’ money not so earmarked would prevent any difficulties being experienced.

The Manchester Courier, and Lancashire General Advertiser noted the summons of 24 resisters in Keighley, including “three ministers, two ex-mayors and magistrates, and a Parliamentary candidate.”

Finally, The Hastings and St. Leonards Observer, in its edition, covered a local passive resistance movement rally. Excerpts:

Passive Resisters.

Assemble at the Royal Concert Hall.

Mr. New Declares the Cause Is Advancing by Leaps and Bounds

The Act Must Be “Mended or Ended.”

“Take Joseph Chamberlain’s Life!”

Fiery Political Oratory.

The local Passive Resisters held a public meeting at the Royal Concert Hall on . There was a large attendance. Three most eloquent speakers orated, but the gathering could hardly be compared with the Resistance Demonstration held , just after the first sale of goods seized in respect to non-payment of rates by Resisters.

…Ladies predominated alike on the platform and in the body of the hall.

The Chairman [Rev. C. New]… congratulated them once more on that large gathering, and he felt it was rather remarkable that whenever they had a meeting on the Education Act they could easily fill the largest building in the town, and this was one of the proofs of the very strong hold the movement had on the sympathies and interest of the general public. (Hear, hear.)… [T]hey could congratulate themselves on the persistent, unbroken progress of the movement, though some persons, who only read the Times and the Daily Telegraph, and never saw those papers which recorded the actual facts, might say otherwise. They would learn from the latter that there were bound up in the movement 20,000 men and women: then they had what was going on in Wales under Mr. Lloyd George — (cheers) — and as soon as ever the London Council issued the demand note in connection with the administration of the London Act the number of Resisters would be increased by 10,000.… Within one hour of that building, and they knew their local trains did not take them very far in an hour — (laughter) — while on one side they had the sea, they had no less than ten strong and determined Passive Resisters’ centres. (Hear, hear.) In their own town he was glad and proud to say that the number of Resisters had during increased by about 60 per cent., or rather more than that. They had had serious losses through migrations from the town, but he was thankful to say he did not know of any backslider or of anyone who was less determined than ever he was to refuse to pay the rate. (Cheers.)… One warning he would give with regard to possible danger: they were hopeful of the result, being confident that they were on the winning side, and they did so, not simply because of the signs they saw but because they were convinced they were on the right side. (Hear, hear.) But they must mark the fact that the victory was not yet won, it was by no means won: the end might be a great deal further off than they were apt to suppose, and it was imperative that they should steadfastly persist. They might be sure that the victory could never be won by half-heartedness, or spasmodic effort, or by occasional impulsive energy, but only by strong, persistent, unconquerable conviction. They could not afford to relax their vigilance in the slightest degree, or to leave undone anything that could be done. If they persisted they would win; but if they failed to persist the prospect of victory would vanish. (Cheers.)

The Rev. Dr. Wenyon [said, among other things]… He had spent much of his life in China, and there the question arose whether converts to Christianity should continue to pay taxes for the support of idol worship. The Wesleyan, London, and Church Missionary Societies’s Committee at home said they must not, and the Chinese became Passive Resisters. (Hear, hear.) He came home and he found himself confronted with the same position, and what could he do but resist? (Cheers.)…

Mr. George White, M.P. spoke next.… For some time he had had to complain that, although one of the first to move in the matter, he had been “left out in the cold.” He had, however, just handed a telegram to his friend, Mr. Horne, which informed him that he would have the privilege of being distrained upon on . (Loud applause.)… Last week, when he appeared before a Bench of Magistrates, and the case was about half through, a friend of his, a Magistrate, spoke to a brother Justice, a Conservative, who said: “It’s not a bit of good going on; the Act must be repealed.” (Hear, hear.)…

For the record, the “Take Joseph Chamberlain’s Life!” promised in the headlines was in reference to a “take my wife… please!”-style joke. A man walks into a bookstore and the clerk suggests a book: “Take The Life of Joseph Chamberlain” and he answers “I would, but I never had the opportunity.” The speaker (George White) was saying he felt the same way about then-Prime Minister Balfour. Continuing:

The Rev. Sylvester Horne… [said] The fact of the matter was, unless the Nonconformists fought the battle, and fought it out, it would not be fought. That was why they were there. Referring to the recent Church Census in London, he said, to use a vulgar phrase from the Tottenham Court-road, those were the people he had got his knife into, the people who were counted as going to Church, but who did not count when the real fighting came on. Where were they? Folding their arms and leaving it to Alderman O’Connor to go to jail — (applause) — and to Mr. White and others whose convictions were dearer to them than property. (Applause.) Those kind of people named their children Oliver Cromwell — (laughter) — or John Hampden. (Renewed laughter.) They lived in a house usually called Bunyan House or Wesley Villa. (Laughter.) He did not reserve all his admiration for the men of 300 years ago. Those people were so heartily in favour of the Reformation, but when they wanted a reformation in their own day, where were they? He did not think they ought to reserve all their enthusiasm for Oliver Cromwell; let them keep a pocket full for John Clifford. (Loud applause.)… He was hoping to live long enough to add another chapter to the history of the Free Churches by writing a history of the movement. (Applause.) Places they had never heard of had sprung into everlasting distinction, Sudbury down in Suffolk, where they turned out every Guardian for not behaving well, and put Passive Resisters in — (applause) — and there had been a most glorious state of things in Sudbury ever since. (Laughter.) What about West Ham? (Applause.) No one could imagine it was a romantic or poetic neighbourhood. But West Ham had been producing heroes, and if they could get heroes from West Ham they could get them out of anywhere. (Laughter, and applause.) Go down to the Isle of Wight. Anyone would tell them that the saintliest person there was the dear old lady who wrote the hymn they all sang as children, and Mrs. [Jemima] Luke had made up her mind that at the age of 91 she would go through the police-court — (applause) — because she said her white hair should never go down in dishonour to the grave. (Applause.)

Jemima Luke would be summoned to court for her resistance in .


We’re up to in our sampling of newspaper coverage of the “passive resistance” campaign against aspects of the Education Act in Britain.

The Gloucester Journal covered the summoning of 32 resisters to the Gloucester Police-court. The Reverend W. Hogan gave a speech to the court on behalf of the group, stating the usual objections against the Act, and adding:

The recent largely attended and thoroughly representative conference held in London to discuss the working of the Education Act of has shown us how great is the need for this protest, for a bad Act is being exploited in every possible way that is harmful to the best interests of the people, by some unscrupulous clergy.

The Derby Daily Telegraph of covered the summonses of two passive resisters from Littleover. One gave a passionate speech which was duly printed by the newspaper, and the magistrates ordered the usual distress warrants.

The London Daily News noted 38 resisters had been summoned to the Epping Petty Sessions, 37 in Lincoln City, eight in Newport, 28 in Hendon, four in Atherton, 17 in Chatham, five in Eltham, seven in Fareham, 61 in Grimsby, 80 in Kettering, ten in Royston, five in Shap, and four more in London. In one of the latter cases, the paper editorialized that the resister “will be summoned at the Mansion House also for the education rate in the City of London — a fitting place, seeing that it was built by fines extorted from Dissenters.” The paper also noted sales of goods of 53 resisters in Long Eaton and 25 in Leighton Buzzard.

In one of the Hendon cases:

An elderly lady, Miss Newberry, wrote that she would rather go to prison than pay, and she hoped the Bench would make the order as early as possible. As there were no goods upon which to levy distress, defendant was committed for seven days, the order to be held over for a fortnight.

In a surprising turn of events, the same paper reported in another case that a member of the establishment church had joined up with the passive resisters:

Churchman’s Strong Protest.

Some sensation was caused at a hearing of Passive Resistance cases in the Framlingham Police Court.

After several of the Resisters had stated their objections “as Nonconformists” to the rate, Mr. J.A. Aldis, of Saxstead Hall, a member of the Established Church, came forward and stated his, and concluded with the remark as genuine as it was unexpected: “Finally, as a Churchman, I object to the rate because it is so scandalously unfair to Nonconformists.”

The Bench, who had listened with courtesy, looked a good deal surprised at such a statement from such a quarter, which was greeted with a murmur of applause from the body of the Court.

An additional article from the same paper concerned a Wesleyan (Methodist) minister who had been trying to win the opportunity to resist the education rate (his church, which was not participating in the passive resistance campaign, had been paying his rates on his behalf). John Clifford wrote to the minister (W. Wakinshaw) to congratulate him on his stand and in the hopes it would bring the Wesleyans in line with other nonconformist churches in supporting the passive resistance movement.

The Nottingham Evening Post of covered the summons of dozens of passive resisters there. This case was rowdier. A spokesperson asked the court if they would hear the protests of two of the resisters, but the court interrupted them and shut them down when they tried to talk about their objections to the law. Then it quickly tried to issue orders against the whole bunch without letting anyone else talk and the courtroom erupted into “indignant cries” and the like.

Finally, the Essex Newsman covered the auction of goods seized from 27 resisters of London and Buckhurst Hill. “A meeting to protest against the Education Act was held afterwards, the Rev. G. Dent presiding. An address was delivered by Alderman O’Connor, who was imprisoned in Chelmsford gaol for non-payment of the education-rate…”


We’re now on and the tax resistance struggle against the Education Act continues.

The Bedsfordshire Advertiser and Luton Times of covered the meeting of the Luton Passive Resistance League. Excerpts:

Mr. Murray Barford said that the new demand note for 1s. 6d. in the £ “poor rate” only contained items amounting to 3d. really for the poor. One item said “5¾d., for borough education,” and of that 3¾d. in the £ would be administered by their local authorities, and 2d. by the respective Vicars and their nominees. That 2d. meant that in the aggregate £2,600 would be handed over to the church people to teach what the Passive Resisters disagreed with, and the Committee recommended that 2d. in the £ be deducted by all Resisters when they paid the rate. He understood the summonses would be much the same as last year, and would come in , and he hoped the magistrates would not be Nonconformists. They would be ready. (Applause).

The Rev. J.W. Mayo, in remarking on the progress of the movement, said that enthusiasm in Leighton was fairly keen. Bedford gaol could hold 130, and he thought the Passive Resisters in the county ought to crowd it out.…

Alderman O’Connor… Referring to his imprisonment for 14 days, he told his incidents humorously. He spent a happy time in prison, though the plank bed was too hard to sleep on and the place was very insanitary, and the food so wretched that he ate very little during the fortnight. He did not think these things were happening by chance, or that God was calling them to something useless.

In a curious turn of events, a reverend from the establishment Church of England threatened a passive resistance campaign on the Church’s part if religious education in the schools were watered down. From the Nottingham Evening Post:

Church Schools.

Suggested Passive Resistance.

Among the resolutions to be submitted at the Manchester Conference of the Church Schools Emergency League, to be held on , is one which will be moved by the Rev. F.E. Allen, rector of Hardwicke, as follows:–

That in the event of a policy of destruction of voluntary schools by out-numbering foundation managers, or so-called abolition of tests for head teachers, being carried out, it will become the duty of Churchmen to meet it by “passive resistance.”

Another resolution asks the members of the league to oppose, denounce, and refuse submission to any legislation which has for its object the setting up by the authority of Parliament in the schools of any form of so-called “simple Christian religion” or “religious instruction” which omits the cardinal doctrines of Christianity as set forth in the Apostle’s Creed, and which the people may be called on to support compulsorily out of rates and taxes, or in any other way.

The Church Schools Emergency League was formed in to oppose attempts by Nonconformists and secularists to end Church of England control over its school staffing and religious curriculum choices. It would represent Church hardliners in the fight against attempted reforms of the Education Act by the subsequent Liberal government.