Tax resistance in the “Peace Churches” →
Quakers →
20th–21st century Quakers →
Frances Crowe
, war tax resisters in New England have been gathering at the Woolman Hill Conference Center in Deerfield, Massachusetts.
The Greenfield Recorder is covering the conference.
’s article mentions Ruthy Woodring, Randy Kehler & Betsy Corner, Aaron Falbel, Frances Crowe, Daniel Staub, Juanita Nelson, Erik Schickendanz, and Daniel Sicken.
A new issue of NWTRCC’s newsletter — More Than a Paycheck — is out featuring an article I wrote about how to craft a persuasive and motivating tax resistance message.
(It’s a distillation of a Picket Line entry from .)
Also in the newsletter are some notes about IRS policy and foibles, an update on the ongoing attempts by war tax resister Daniel Jenkins to find a legal forum that will rule that conscientious objection to military taxation is a human right, and the latest on All Saints Church’s struggle to maintain its freedom of speech and its tax-exempt status at the same time.
“I suddenly woke up about five years ago and made a big sign that said ‘Does Our Lifestyle Demand War?’ and hung it on my door.”
Frances then proceeded to work at changing her lifestyle, starting by not using her car for two days a week.
As she walked more, she found she could use her car less and less — and liked walking more and more.
It became something of a meditation, with the added bonus of meeting people along the way.
She changed from a Friends Meeting that was some miles away to one within walking distance, and dropped her YMCA membership where they use so much heat and air conditioning.
She doesn’t want to fly anymore and takes the train instead.
She’s still working on many things, like buying food that is grown locally.
She’s really working to reduce her footprint on the planet, and at the same time redirecting taxes from war to funding real human needs like schools, peace and justice work, and rebuilding the new society in the shell of the old.
Erica Weiland notes that while there may not be an ongoing military draft conscripting soldiers in the U.S., if you are a U.S. taxpayer, you have already been drafted.
I no longer pay federal taxes, but I do file. I set up a trust, and put
everything in my children’s names, so I own nothing. But the government
does take money out of my social security, and I donate a sum equivalent
to my federal taxes to charity.
So, I try to put a third of my “tax money” into repairing the damages of
war — I’ve been helping a woman go to school in Afghanistan, and I gave a
thousand dollars for her to pay for tuition this year. I do things like
that, and help this cancer clinic in Iraq. And a third goes to peace
centers in this country. It costs me money, but it’s worth it for my
conscience.
War tax resisters who hope to get some legal blessing for their stand have
traditionally appealed either to the legislature (by lobbying for something
like a “peace tax fund” bill), or to the courts (by trying to get
conscientious objection to military taxation recognized as a protected
right). But Leigh Osofsky, an Associate Professor of Law at the University
of Miami, reminds us that the executive branch, too, has discretion in how it enforces the tax law — refusing to enforce some parts of it and enforcing other parts of it in selective or spotty ways.
Other Links of Interest
Colin Donoghue’s meditation on “The Root Injustice, & A Real Way Forward to a Sustainable Society” tries to unravel the tangle that happens when people try to promote progressive ends by means of an inherently inegalitarian, coercive, privilege-entrenching institution like government.
Stephen Ruth discovered that Suffolk County officials had unsafely manipulated the timing of traffic lights to trick drivers into running red lights and increase the revenue from the ticket-issuing red-light cameras.
He was so furious that he not only blew the whistle, but he cut the wires to the cameras to foil the scheme.
American war tax resister Frances Crowe is 98 years old.
That didn’t stop her from getting arrested in a civil disobedience action against a planned natural gas pipeline.
She was convicted, and is now refusing to pay the fine.
Welt wonders where Thoreau would find himself in today’s political landscape, and concludes: “He belongs to nobody; he cannot be monopolized by any party. ‘The only obligation which I have a right to assume,’ said Thoreau, ‘is to do at any time what I think right.’ Ideologies, even progressive ones, bothered him.”
The Den Plirono movement is still sending out its Harry Tuttle-like engineers to reconnect the power to families who have lost electricity for failure to keep up with the tax hikes the government has added to utility bills.
Some links from here and there:
YouTuber Alexis Buschmann has started to offer spoken-word interpretations of some of NWTRCC’s introductory war tax resistance material on her video blog. This could be a useful resource for people who prefer to get their information in the podcast/audiobook style rather than through text. Here’s a sample:
American anti-abortion tax resister Michael Bowman continues his streak of courtroom luck. This time, a hung jury foiled the government’s attempt to convict him of misdemeanor charges of failure to file. (In an earlier victory, the court threw out an additional charge of felony tax evasion.) The government may decide to refile the misdemeanor charges and try again. “They put me on the stand,” said Bowman, “they know what kind of witness I am. And round two, they haven’t seen anything yet; I’ve learned.”
Bowman’s attorney tried at one point to advance the argument that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act requires the government to accommodate Bowman’s sincere religious objection to paying for abortion with his taxes. Although the courts have rejected such arguments in the past with reference to war tax resisters, the Supreme Court’s subsequent Hobby Lobby ruling seemed to possibly open the door to reconsidering this. The trial court disagreed.
Rutgers International Institute for Peace has begun releasing a Digital Library of Nonviolent Resistance with items from their archives. Among these is Organizing Tax Resistance, co-written by a team from Nonviolence International and Karen Marysdaughter from NWTRCC.
The Delta Amacuro (Venezuela) state Chamber of Commerce has launched a tax strike to protest what they say are extralegal and “confiscatory” municipal taxes.
The Nkafu branch of La Société Civile has signed on to the latest tax resistance campaign in the east Congo to protest the government’s inability or unwillingness to provide security in the region.
In other news, the group ADNic is promoting a Nicaraguan tax resistance / consumer strike campaign with a series of graphics. Here are some examples (translations mine):
Tax resistance: Education and Outreach. Step 5: Take an active role in tax resistance and keep in mind that Ortega uses your taxes to kill. #ConsumerStrike #SOSNicaragua
Tax Resistance. This Is Their Profit. Rum: 36%, Beers: 42%, Liquors: 37%, Grain alcohol: 42%, Cigarettes: 309%, Tobacco: 43%. By reducing your consumption you strike a direct blow against the regime. Taxes are their lifeblood! #ConsumerStrike, National Unity
Some notes on recent trends in tax enforcement, including frivolous fines, wage garnishment, audit rates of the poor, state-and-local tax deduction limits, and cooperation between tax enforcers in the U.S. and Canada.
According to the details of the newish law concerning passports and tax
scofflaws, when the amount of someone’s overdue taxes rises above a certain
threshold ($52,000 last I checked), the
IRS
must notify the State Department, whereupon the State Department
must not issue a new passport to that scofflaw or renew their existing
passport (unless the scofflaw is taking certain specified steps to pay up or
contest the tax debt), and may revoke any existing passport that
person has.
That’s all the law allows for. It does not specify under what circumstances the
State Department should revoke existing passports, or even mandate that they do
so at all. It is merely an option. Now it emerges that the
IRS hopes
to put more teeth into that provision on its own initiative. It plans to send
requests to the State Department, on a case-by-case basis, asking State to
revoke the passports from people the
IRS
believes might thereby be prodded into paying what they owe.
This process is not something that was explicitly authorized by the law, but
TIGTA
didn’t seem to think that was a problem. “There is no law or regulation that
directly authorizes the
IRS to
prioritize taxpayers to be referred to the State Department for revocation;
however, we believe it is reasonable for the
IRS to
provide the State Department with taxpayers for possible revocation to comply
with the law.”