Some historical and global examples of tax resistance →
Islamic State
Researchers Isak Svensson, Jonathan Hall, Dino Krause, and Eric Skoog of the Department of Peace and Conflict Research at Uppsala Uniersitet have examined the role of nonviolent civil disobedience among the conquered subjects of the Islamic State movement.
They summarize their conclusions in today’s Washington Post.
Excerpt:
A more common type of resistance was to withdraw one’s full cooperation with the Islamic State authorities.
After seizing control of Mosul, the Islamic State established a sophisticated bureaucracy and tax system.
Public institutions were largely taken over and operated under the Islamic State’s control, including schools, universities and courts.
Some residents manifested their defiance by not paying taxes, refusing to cooperate with the Islamic State’s legal institutions, or withdrawing from schools and universities.
Our survey shows that this type of resistance was common and widespread:
If we put all types of noncooperation together, 62 percent of the respondents reportedly engaged in at least one of them.
While generally less risky because it was less visible, this type of resistance still entailed significant risks if detected.
The Islamic State is known to have publicly whipped people for alleged tax evasion or because they taught private classes.
Some tabs that have slid across my browser in recent days:
International Tax Resistance
A driver in Saudi Araba films himself attacking a traffic ticket robot with a pistol.
You may remember that Indian Prime Minister Modi abruptly removed high-denomination bank notes from the ranks of legal tender in . This was meant to strike a knockout-blow at the underground economy by forcing people to use more legible, traceable economic transactions than anonymous cash. It doesn’t seem to have worked. Despite the significant short-term inconvenience and blow to the economy, the amount of cash currency in circulation quickly recovered to its previous levels and is now back on-trend to where it was before the experiment. You may have heard calls to eliminate the U.S. $100 bill, for similar motives. This experience may discourage such an effort.
The National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee held a national conference in Washington, D.C. .
Here’s a write-up by one of the attendees. Unfortunately they got tangled up in ongoing actions by leftist activists who were trying to occupy the Venezualan embassy there on behalf of the brutal, disastrous Maduro regime.
It has been a disappointing thing to see groups like NWTRCC, CodePink, Veterans for Peace, and United for Peace and Justice carrying water for the cruel Maduro tyranny as though that were the only way to oppose disingenuous U.S. machinations there.
It puts a shameful stain on what’s left of the U.S. peace movement every time a group like this uses a phrase like “the legitimate democratic Maduro government of Venezuela”.
A number of items that have been in the news lately concern how the U.S. tax system has become increasingly corrupt and imbalanced in favor of wealthy tax evaders.
Stories like this tend to damage what’s known in tax wonk circles as “taxpayer morale” — the willingness of citizens to pay their taxes without evasion or the necessity of harsh arm-twisting and draconian oversight.
For example:
The New York Times pointed out that in California, local governments and corporations have rigged the sales tax system in such a way that a portion of the sales tax people pay is gifted to the same companies who collect it.
In other words, the sales tax becomes a “bonus profit” to those companies, collected from consumers and enforced by law.
Millions of former U.S. tax filers appear to have dropped out — not filing returns in the last filing season.
One theory is that the tax reform legislation that came into effect last year caused some people to owe where they hadn’t before, or to owe more, and that they decided not to file as a result.
Three million people who received refunds in didn’t file at all in .
There’s been another report put out about the “tax gap” (the difference between what’s owed and what’s collected) in the U.S.
However it still uses largely stale numbers, updating them largely based on estimates and trends rather than evidence.