Some historical and global examples of tax resistance → United States → Vietnam War, ~1965–75 → No Tax for War Committee protest, 1967

Here are a handful of artifacts relating to the American war tax resistance movement circa .

First, some relics that were filed alongside a letter from Herbert Sonthoff to W. Walter Boyd (though I think this filing may be arbitrary and that the letters are not related to each other):

An Open Letter *

At this late date it is pointless to muster the evidence which shows that the war we are waging in Vietnam is wrong. By now you have decided for yourself where you stand. In all probability, if you share our feelings about it, you have expressed your objections both privately and publicly. You have witnessed the small effect these protests have had on our government.

By , every American citizen must decide whether he will make a voluntary contribution to the continuation of this war. After grave consideration, we have decided that we can no longer do so, and that we will therefore withhold all or part of the taxes due. The purpose of this letter is to call your attention to the fact that a nationwide tax refusal campaign is in progress, as stated in the accompanying announcement, and to urge you to consider refusing to contribute voluntarily to this barbaric war.

Signed:

Prof. Warren AmbroseMathematics, M.I.T.
Dr. Donnell BoardmanPhysician, Acton, Mass.
Mrs. Elizabeth BoardmanActon, Mass.
Prof. Noam ChomskyLinguistics, M.I.T.
Miss Barbara DemingWriter, Wellfleet, Mass.
Prof. John DolanPhilosophy, Chicago University
Prof. John EkAnthropology, Long Island University
Martha Bentley HallMusician, Brookline, Mass.
Dr. Thomas C. HallPhysician, Brookline, Mass.
Rev. Arthur B. JellisFirst Parish in Concord, Unitarian-Universalist, Concord, Mass.
Prof. Donald KalishPhilosophy, U.C.L.A.
Prof. Louis KampfHumanities, M.I.T.
Prof. Staughton LyndHistory, Yale University
Milton MayerWriter, Mass.
Prof. Jonathan MirskyChinese Language and Literature, Dartmouth College
Prof. Sidney MorgenbesserPhilosophy, Columbia University
Prof. Wayne A. O’NeillGraduate School of Education, Harvard University
Prof. Anatol RapoportMental Health Research Institute, University of Michigan
Prof. Franz SchurmannCenter for Chinese Studies, University of Calif., Berkeley
Dr. Albert Szent GyorgyInstitute for Muscle Research, Woods Hole, Mass.
Harold TovishSculptor, Brookline, Mass.
Prof. Howard ZinnGovernment, Boston University

* Institutions listed for informational purposes only

P.S. The No Tax for War Committee intends to make public the names of signers, hence if you wish to add your signature, early return is desirable. Contributions are needed, and checks should be made payable to the Committee.

The following page, dated , shows a mock-up of the intended public advertisement showing the signers’ names:

No Income Tax For War! Now Particularly the U.S. War in Vietnam. Statement: Because so much of the tax paid the federal government goes for poisoning of food crops, blasting of villages, napalming and killing of thousands upon thousands of people, as in Vietnam at the present time, I am not going to pay taxes on 1966 income. Name ___. Address ___. [In order to withdraw support from war, particularly the savage and expanding war in Southeast Asia– Some are refusing to pay their total tax, or some portion. ☐ Some have in advance lowered their income so as to owe none. ☐ (for our information, would you like to check which form of nonpayment you are following?) NOTE: There are laws which (although not usually applied to principled refusers) cover possible fine and jail term for non-payment of a legally-owed amount.]

The committee will publish the above statement with names of signers at tax deadline — .

Send signed statements to: NO TAX FOR WAR COMMITTEE, c/o Rev. Maurice McCrackin, 932 Dayton St., Cincinnati, Ohio 45214.

For additional copies of this form, put number you will distribute and name and address on the following lines:
No. _____ Name ____________________
Address _________________________

Signers So Far

  • Meldon and Amy Acheson
  • Michael J. Ames
  • Alfred F. Andersen
  • Ross Anderson
  • Beulah K. Arndt
  • Joan Baez
  • Richard Baker
  • Bruce & Pam Beck
  • Ruth T. Best
  • Robert & Margaret Blood
  • Karel F. Botermans
  • Marion & Ernest Bromley
  • Edwin Brooks
  • A. Dale Brothington
  • Mrs. Lydia Bruns
  • Wendal Bull
  • Mrs. Dorothy Bucknell
  • John Burslem
  • Lindley J. Burton
  • Catharine J. Cadbury
  • Maris Cakars
  • Robert and Phyllis Calese
  • William N. Calloway
  • Betty Camp
  • Daryle V. Carter
  • Jared & Susan Carter
  • Horace & Beulah Champney
  • Ken & Peggy Champney
  • Hank & Henry Chapin
  • Holly Chenery
  • Richard A. Chinn
  • Naom [sic] Chomsky
  • John & Judy Christian
  • Gordon & Mary Christiansen
  • Peter Christiansen
  • Donald F. Cole
  • John Augustine Cook
  • Helen Marr Cook
  • Jack Coolidge, Jr.
  • Allen Cooper
  • Martin J. Corbin
  • Tom & Monica Cornell
  • Dorothy J. Cunningham
  • Jean DaCosta
  • Ann & William Davidon
  • Stanley F. Davis
  • Dorothy Day
  • Dave Dellinger
  • Barbara Deming
  • Robert Dewart
  • Ruth Dodd
  • John M. Dolan
  • Orin Doty
  • Allen Duberstein
  • Ralph Dull
  • Malcolm Dundas
  • Margaret E. Dungan
  • Henry Dyer
  • Susan Eanet
  • Bob Eaton
  • Marc Paul Edelman
  • Johan & Francis Eliot
  • Jerry Engelbach
  • George J. Etu, Jr.
  • Mary C. Eubanks
  • Arthur Evans
  • Jonathan Evans
  • William E. Evans
  • Pearl Ewald
  • Franklin Farmer
  • Bertha Faust
  • Dianne M. Feeley
  • Rice A. Felder
  • Henry A. Felisone
  • Mildred Fellin
  • Glenn Fisher
  • John Forbes
  • Don & Ann Fortenberry
  • Marion C. Frenyear
  • Ruth Gage-Colby
  • Lawrence H. Geller
  • Richard Ghelli
  • Charles Gibadlo
  • Bruce Glushakow
  • Walter Gormly
  • Arthur Goulston
  • Thomas Grabell
  • Steven Green
  • Walter Grengg
  • Joseph Gribbins
  • Kenneth Gross
  • John M. Grzywacz, Jr.
  • Catherine Guertin
  • David Hartsough
  • David Hartsough
  • Arthur Harvey
  • Janet Hawksley
  • James P. Hayes, Jr.
  • R.F. Helstern
  • Ammon Hennacy
  • Norman Henry
  • Robert Hickey
  • Dick & Heide Hiler
  • William Himelhoch
  • C.J. Hinke
  • Anthony Hinrichs
  • William M. Hodsdon
  • Irwin R. Hogenauer
  • Florence Howe
  • Donald & Mary Huck
  • Philip Isely
  • Michael Itkin
  • Charles T. Jackson
  • Paul Jacobs
  • Martin & Nancy Jezer
  • F. Robert Johnson
  • Woodbridge O. Johnson
  • Ashton & Marie Jones
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Keiser
  • Joel C. Kent
  • Roy C. Kepler
  • Paul & Pauline Kermiet
  • Peter Kiger
  • Richard King
  • H.A. Kreinkamp
  • Arthur & Margaret Landes
  • Paul Lauter
  • Peter and Marolyn Leach
  • Gertrud & George A. Lear, Jr.
  • Alan and Elin Learnard
  • Titus Lehman
  • Richard A. Lema
  • Florence Levinsohn
  • Elliot Linzer
  • David C. Lorenz
  • Preston B. Luitweiler
  • Bradford Lyttle
  • Adriann van L. Maas
  • Ben & Sue Mann
  • Paul and Salome Mann
  • Howard E. Marston, Sr.
  • Milton and Jane Mayer
  • Martin & Helen Mayfield
  • Maurice McCrackin
  • Lilian McFarland
  • Maureen & Felix McGowan
  • Maryann McNaughton
  • Gelston McNeil
  • Guy W. Meyer
  • Karl Meyer
  • David & Catherine Miller
  • James Missey
  • Mark Morris
  • Janet Murphy
  • Thomas P. Murray
  • Rosemary Nagy
  • Wally & Juanita Nelson
  • Marilyn Neuhauser
  • Neal D. Newby, Jr.
  • Miriam Nicholas
  • Robert B. Nichols
  • David Nolan
  • Raymond S. Olds
  • Wayne A. O’Neil
  • Michael O’Quin
  • Ruth Orcutt
  • Eleanor Ostroff
  • Doug Palmer
  • Malcolm & Margaret Parker
  • Jim Peck
  • Michael E. Pettie
  • John Pettigrew
  • Lydia H. Philips
  • Dean W. Plagowski
  • Jefferson Poland
  • A.J. Porth
  • Ralph Powell
  • Charles F. Purvis
  • Jean Putnam
  • Harriet Putterman
  • Robert Reitz
  • Ben & Helen Reyes
  • Elsa G. Richmond
  • Eroseanna Robinson
  • Pat Rusk
  • Joe & Helen Ryan
  • Paul Salstrom
  • Ira J. Sandperl
  • Jerry & Rae Schwartz
  • Martin Shepard
  • Richard T. Sherman
  • Louis Silverstein
  • T.W. Simer
  • Ann B. Sims
  • Jane Beverly Smith
  • Linda Smith
  • Thomas W. Smuda
  • Bob Speck
  • Elizabeth P. Steiner
  • Lee D. Stern
  • Beverly Sterner
  • Michael Stocker
  • Charles H. Straut, Jr.
  • Stephen Suffet
  • Albert & Joyce Sunderland, Jr.
  • Mr. & Mrs. Michael R. Sutter
  • Marjorie & Robert Swann
  • Oliver & Katherine Tatum
  • Gary G. Taylor
  • Harold Tovish
  • Joe & Cele Tuchinsky
  • Lloyd & Phyllis Tyler
  • Samuel R. Tyson
  • Ingegerd Uppman
  • Margaret von Selle
  • Mrs. Evelyn Wallace
  • Wilbur & Joan Ann Wallis
  • William & Mary Webb
  • Barbara Webster
  • John K. White
  • Willson Whitman
  • Denny & Ida Wilcher
  • Huw Williams
  • George & Lillian Willoughby
  • Bob Wilson
  • Emily T. Wilson
  • Jim & Raona Wilson
  • W.W. Wittkamper
  • Sylvia Woog
  • Wilmer & Mildred Young
  • Franklin Zahn
  • Betty & Louis Zemel
  • Vicki Jo Zilinkas

Following this was a page explaining how to go about resisting:

Some Methods of Nonpayment

  1. For those owing nothing because of the Withholding Tax.

    Such persons write a letter to the Internal Revenue Service, to be filed with the tax return, stating that the writer cannot in good conscience help support the war in Vietnam, voluntarily. The writer therefore requests a return of a percentage of the money collected from his salary.

    Note: Of course, the IRS will not return the money. However, the writer has refused to pay for the war voluntarily and has put it in writing. This symbolic action is not to be belittled since anybody who does this allies himself with those who will withhold money due the IRS.
  2. For those self-employed or owing money beyond what has been withheld from salary.

    Such persons write a letter to be filed with the tax return, stating that the writer does not object to the income tax in principle, but will not, as a matter of conscience, help pay for the war in Vietnam. The writer is therefore withholding some or all of the tax due.

Note: In all cases, we recommend that copies of these letters be sent to the President and to your Senators.

Remarks:
The Internal Revenue Service has the legal power to confiscate money due it. They will get that money, one way or another. However, to obstruct the IRS from collecting money due (by not filing a return at all, for example) seems less important to us than the fact that each is refusing to pay his tax voluntarily. With this in mind, many of us are placing the taxes owed in special accounts and we will so inform the IRS in our letters.

Willful failure to pay is punishable by a fine of up to $10,000 and up to a year in jail, together with the costs of prosecution. So far, the IRS has prosecuted only those who have obstructed collection (by refusing to file a return, by refusing to answer a summons, etc.). Usually, the IRS has collected the tax due plus 6% interest and possibly an added fine of 5% for “negligence”. The fact that the IRS has rarely, if at all, prosecuted tax-refusers to the full extent of the law does not mean they will not do so in the future.

Finally, an article from the edition of The Capitol East Gazette:

Tax Refusal Urged by Group

Two thousand anti-war leaflets on telephone tax refusal were distributed in Capitol East on , by members of CHOICE, a group of local residents who are withdrawing their support for the Vietnam war.

The leaflet explains that the 10% phone tax was enacted in specifically to raise money for the Vietnam war.

According to CHOICE, the phone company will not remove a person’s telephone if he refuses to pay the tax. The company asks refusers to state why they are withholding the tax and then turns the matter over to the Internal Revenue Service.

According to CHOICE, there are presently 25 known tax refusers in the Capitol Hill area.

Those desiring CHOICE’s leaflet are asked to call LI 6‒9836.


Alan Emory, the long-time Washington D.C. correspondent for the Watertown Times, penned a dismissive article about war tax resisters for that paper’s edition.

With its quotes and paraphrases of unnamed “officials” and its furious hand waving, it reads to me as a desperate attempt by the government to throw water on a spreading brush fire by means of a cooperative and sympathetic reporter. (Emory’s parents were both in government, and, as a Washington reporter, Emory was about as antagonistic to politicians as a sportscaster is to athletes.)

Protests for Publicity?

Fewer Americans Using War As Excuse for Dodging Taxes

 Fewer Americans are using the Vietnam war as an excuse for not paying all or part of their income taxes , according to the Internal Revenue service.

And most of them appear to be making the protest for publicity purposes, officials believe.

Instead, the protesters appear to be more active in using the war as a reason for not paying telephone excise taxes.

In both cases, however, the numbers are relatively insignificant.

Out of 70,000,000 income taxpayers, the IRS says only 275 declined to pay up in full because of Vietnam in and only 520 in . So far, the count shows 93.

As for the telephone tax refusals, “about 4,800” out of 50,000,000 users took this line last year, according to Internal Revenue Commissioner Sheldon Cohen.

The American Telephone & Telegraph company put the figure at 700 in and 1,800 during . The figure included 86 residents of Pennsylvania — out of 3,000,000 telephone subscribers — and 25 in New Jersey out of 2,200,000.

IRS officials say the Vietnam protest first showed up as a tax factor in . Individuals ran to newspapers and issued press releases, they said, and filed their returns with a note or letter citing the war protest.

Some groups held protest meetings in front of IRS offices and passed out flyers.

The tax collectors’ problems, however, turned out to be surprisingly small. When, after sending out the normal number of letters to the taxpayer, the IRS sent an agent to his home, he was usually greeted with “We were expecting you,” and the taxpayer then told the agent the bank in which his funds were deposited.

The government either filed a lien or, in some cases, went to the bank with the taxpayer and obtained the money right there.

The IRS found out that many of the protesting taxpayers had not received enough income to require any taxes. Others had enough withheld to cover what they owed. Some had salaries attached.

One taxpayer has consistently shrugged off IRS communications, including those showing he had refunds due.

Cohen says the war protest cases are being handled “under special procedures and we are pursuing them through to collection.”

“If any taxes are due we will collect them down to the last dollar,” he says.

Only 1,500 to 2,000 go to jail for not paying taxes in a single year, though, and very few of them belong in the war protest lists. One official said that 25 per cent of the protest petition signers are “students and hippies.”

When the phone tax problem showed up in , the phone companies agreed to make out lists for the IRS of those who would not pay the tax. Ironically, the paper work involved in making the collection is usually more costly than the money owed.

No jailings have resulted from this situation yet.

The most famous protester on taxes and the war is folk singer Joan Baez, who has been seeking a $36,528 refund on her tax payment of $60,948. Although Miss Baez regularly withholds part of her tax because of Vietnam, the IRS goes right ahead and attaches income, property and bank accounts to pay any tax left unpaid. Last week she said she will withhold her entire tax .

The singer paid $6,000 in penalties and interest for . Government officials consider that a fee for what they call “front-page advertising.” Her taxable income in was $110,000.

The first mass tax protest involving Vietnam came with the publication of a notice signed by 350-odd names, mostly writers and educators, led by Rev. A.J. Muste, a well-known pacifist leader who had not paid any income taxes  — well before Vietnam.

Other signers included pianist Anton Kuerti and former Yale Prof. Staughton Lynd, Merrel Lynd, co-author of “Middletown,” and biochemist Albert Szent-Gyorgi. In , another protest list was printed in newspapers, and this year a third, with 448 sign…

Here, alas, the reproduction of the article available on-line gives out, and if Emory’s article was syndicated elsewhere in full, I haven’t been able to find it in any of the on-line archives (an abbreviated version was picked up by The Milwaukee Journal).