Why it is your duty to stop supporting the government → calls to action! → by me

So there’s this tension in me between seeing this experiment on the one hand as a personal gesture aimed at trying to stop being complicit in the actions of the government, and on the other hand as a potential tactic of nonviolent action aimed at, well, I think the kids are calling it “regime change” these days.

I’ve tended toward the former, since it’s something real that I can evaluate, and, in a more emotional and visceral way, feel. But I haven’t been able to shake the idea that if enough people joined in that it would make a difference, or at least it could be part of a program that would make a difference.

I don’t think that our government is going to be defunded by tax protesters, but I think a significant dent in the budget could be made — significant enough to make the money-spenders take notice. In any case, if a critical mass of people, or enough well-known or well-respected people, took this step it would certainly signify that a new line had been crossed. The opposition would be taken more seriously, and, as important, they would take themselves more seriously.

So I got to thinking about what kind of rallying cry I could design to try to convince people to join in. Before long, I was writing a long rant. Here it is:

You already know that things have gotten bad. Our democracy was drunkenly crashed and never sent to the repair shop. The government is preaching liberty but imprisoning a higher percentage of its citizens than any other country on earth. Now it is trying to evade the few remaining protections the courts will enforce by “disappearing” people indefinitely in cages on foreign soil where the Constitution won’t reach. It is condoning, and even participating in torture — in the twenty-first century: torture! It is using bald-faced lies to justify world-dominating ambitions of a sort we used to like to claim we were defending the world against.

Maybe you’ve wondered to yourself, “what will I do if it gets so bad that I have to do something?” You know that there are few things more shameful than being like the “Good German” who did his best to keep his head down and go about his business as the stormtroopers marched by. Or maybe you already realize that it is bad enough — you know that America can be better and should be better and that its current policies are not just unfortunate and misguided, but utterly shameful and horribly dangerous. But you’re not sure what to do about it.

You’re not alone. There are many, many people who feel the same way. Some of them have found their calling and are working to fight for what is right. But it’s also true that a lot of people who feel the way you do are actively supporting the very government and the very policies that they know are wrong.

Ronald Reagan’s Secretary of State, Alexander Haig, famously dismissed the people who were protesting against the continuing arms race by saying, “let them march all they want, so long as they continue to pay their taxes.” [This quote has proven difficult to verify and may be apocryphal―♇]

He hit the nail on the head: Write all the letters-to-the-editor you want, carry your signs and banners downtown, practice your chants and put that bumper-sticker on your car — the folks in power don’t much care: that sort of thing has never gotten in their way before. If you’re still paying your taxes, the government can consider you a supporter no matter what you’ve got on your T-shirt or your weblog.

What’s the point of mentioning this? After all, aren’t “death and taxes” life’s inevitables? Well, as it turns out, the federal income tax is far from inevitable.

Today, about 25% of the people who file federal income tax returns in the United States end up putting a big zero on the line that says how much they owe. That’s right — a quarter of U.S. “taxpayers” don’t pay any federal income tax. Some of them even get “refunds” of money they never paid in the first place.

I swear I’m not selling anything — I don’t have some far-out overseas investment scheme or a book about some weird legal theory that makes the IRS roll their eyes and call their lawyers. I’m just telling you the facts as they are: Lots and lots of people in the United States don’t pay taxes because they don’t have to. You can look it up.

How do they do it? A few of them are crafty, and use various sneaky tax dodges — or they don’t need to earn any “income” because they have plenty of money already. But most of them just plain don’t earn enough money to rise above the threshold of taxation in the first place.

25% of income tax filers are not helping to row the ship of state. Now that you know this — what is your excuse? Why do you continue to row? You see where the ship is going. You know who’s at the helm. You know that what the government is doing is terribly wrong. You know that you are subsidizing this with your tax dollars. And now you know that to avoid being an accessory to the crime is so easy that fully one quarter of your fellow “taxpayers” are getting away with it.

“Well,” you might say, “it would take quite a sacrifice for me to lower my income that much. I don’t know if a life of poverty is a good trade-off for no longer funding the government. There must be another way.”

Oh, there are other ways to oppose what the government is doing, and I hope you find one. Remember, though, that if you start off by supporting the government with your money, you’ve got a bigger hole to dig yourself out of if you want to oppose it with the rest of your actions.

And if you think lowering your income enough to evade taxes is a terrible sacrifice either you don’t know just how much untaxed income you can get away with (in which case, do your homework), or you aren’t really all that interested in washing the blood off of your hands (in which case, well, sucks to be you). Be happy if this is the only sacrifice you’re being asked to make. If things in the United States continue on their present trajectory, a lot more is going to be demanded of you and you’ll wish you’d gotten around to the easy stuff sooner.

This year I made more money than 90–95% of the people on earth and I’m not paying a dime of it in federal income tax. And I’m not playing sneaky, illegal tricks with the IRS, or using bizarre theories out of some tax protester’s handbook. I’m using legitimate exemptions and deductions in a completely above-board manner, because, like 25% of the rest of us, I don’t owe anything. If the IRS comes and audits my returns next year, I’ll come out smelling like a rose.

Go on strike! You might be convinced to do it for more pay, better benefits, and safer working conditions. So why not go on strike to protect your conscience from participation in what you know to be wrong? Why not go on strike and take back those hours of the day you used to spend working to satisfy the warped spending priorities of a bunch of craven politicians.

Yes, you may have to make less money than you’re making now — I’m making about a quarter of what I was before I took the plunge. Swallow hard and deal with it. You’ll still be filthy rich compared to most of mankind, and if that isn’t a good enough trade to get your soul back I’m sorry because you’re not likely to find a better one. Ask yourself what you’d have to change in your life in order to live on less, and then start doing it. Get out of debt, watch your spending, reconsider expensive pastimes and possessions. The best things in life are free, so start helping yourself to ’em. Here’s something to sweeten the pot: earning less money takes less time — so you’ll have more time to enjoy the best things in life.

If you and your friends go and hold up a banner in front of the federal building, well, that’s just a sign. But if you and your friends go on strike — that’s a sign. It’s a sign that you’re really fed up, that you’re not just going to complain about it but you’re going to change your life to do something about it. And it’s a sign that the politicians will sit up and take notice of because it’s written in money, a language that they understand.

I think it needs some work. First off, it’s too damned long. Second, it’s too arrogant. It’s one thing to be confident, especially when you’re trying to rally the troops. It’s another to claim that you’ve got it all figured out and you’ve got the solution everyone’s been looking for. (It’s also probably insensitive to people who are already in the under-the-tax-line 25%, not by choice, and who would consider a challenge to reduce their income to be absurd if not obscene.) I’ve got to trim it down a bunch and respect uncertainty and ambiguity, and better target it at current taxpayers.

I’d appreciate if those of you who have read this far would give me your impressions of the rant’s strengths and weaknesses.


Salon prints a few paragraphs of my tax resistance propaganda in their Letters column:

In Salon’s readership are, at most, a small handful of U.S. diplomats. A Call to Conscience, then, can best be read as yet another hope that “somebody else” can be called upon to change their behavior or disrupt their lifestyle in order to assuage the Salon reader’s conscience over what is happening in Iraq and Gitmo.

How about this, Salon reader: Change your own behavior and lifestyle!

When Henry David Thoreau was called to Framingham, Mass., to denounce slavery in the American South, he turned down the invitation to denounce those evildoers far away and instead turned on the self-satisfied audience, delivering the speech Slavery in Massachusetts.

Elsewhere, Thoreau ridiculed those who said proudly, “I should like to have them order me out to help put down an insurrection of the slaves, or to march to Mexico; — see if I would go.” He knew that these same people did not need to be drafted into battle because they “directly by their allegiance, and so indirectly, at least, by their money, furnished a substitute.”

So how about a “Call to Conscience” to a larger set of Salon’s readers: the taxpayers. Now you’ve seen the pictures and you know what your taxes are paying for. It’s time you learn how to stop.


Madison, Wis. (SNF) — The anti-war protest coalition Citizens United for Peace (CUP) announced that they are launching a large-scale, multi-faceted tax protest in which they will call on people to “divest from the war machine.”

The coalition’s member groups, which include “United for Justice and Peace” and “Not In My Name,” vowed to ask each of their individual members to stop paying at least some portion of their federal taxes, in protest of the war in Iraq and other policies.

“We believe that as people living in the United States it is our responsibility to resist the injustices done by our government, in our names and with our money,” read a press release from CUP. “Tax resistance is the most direct way we can make this resistance felt.”

According to the group, about half of what the federal government collects in taxes is spent on war, arms, and war-related expenses. “We can’t work to stop this war with our voices while we’re funding it with our paychecks.”

CUP has created a list of tax resistance methods and has asked those who join its campaign to select at least one of these to engage in immediately, and at least one other to work toward.

“Some of these methods are simple, some are more difficult,” says Carla Paxworthy, spokesperson for the National League of War Tax Resistance, who helped to draw up the “tax resistance matrix” list of techniques for CUP. “Some can be done by anyone, others aren’t for everyone. Some are entirely legal, and some require civil disobedience.

“We’re aiming for 100% [of coalition members participating],” Paxworthy says. “There’s something on the list that everyone can do today. And everything on the list is something that decreases the amount that we’re paying for war.”

Paxworthy says her organization will help counsel individual resisters and will serve as a clearinghouse for information on the experiences of tax resisters nationwide.

Ignis Brünnlig, of the IRS press office, said “the United States has a proud tradition of dissent, but we also have a system in which we all must contribute to the benefits we share as part of this nation. It’s important that people realize that the law is very clear that we all have to pay our fair share.”

But according to Mai Paga, who has been a tax resister for 14 years, the IRS bark is much worse than its bite. “First off, there are ways to resist taxes that aren’t illegal at all,” she says. “But in the history of war tax resistance in the United States, there haven’t been a dozen people who’ve done time for it.”

Still, some campaign coordinators say that the IRS may respond to a large-scale campaign with some high-profile prosecutions to try to discourage people from signing on. Paxworthy warns, “nobody should go into this without being aware of the risks and being ready to face the consequences.”

Thus reads a news article from an alternate future! (Cue theramin.)

I’m trying to bring a little more solidity to this vision I have of the U.S. opposition becoming more organized, energized, and relevant. The slice of America that prefers peace to war and justice to injustice is, I suspect, thanks to the combination of inexorable taxation and hopeless passivity, actually working harder for war and injustice than for their own values.

We’ve got to turn that around. It seems to me that the time for being inoffensive and ineffective is over. The people on the side of war and domination don’t make a hobby or fashion statement of it. They don’t limit themselves to bumper stickers and blogs. They’ve made careers of their passion, they’ve requisitioned tax money, they command armies.

Give me a reality check here, will ya, team? Am I making sense? Can we ask a little bit more of ourselves as activists? Today I’m going to reach a little more than yesterday, and tomorrow a little more still, until I’m putting all my weight behind my beliefs and not letting myself be used as fuel shoveled into the engine of the war machine. That sort of pledge ought to have the strength of a vow for us. Don’t say you’re for peace and justice if all you’re willing to do is wave a sign for it, or go to a movie about it, or vote for someone who’s possibly less against it than the other guy.

Damn. Listen to me rant and rave today.


I finally got my hands on a copy of Claire Wolfe’s inspiring book The Freedom Outlaw’s Handbook. It’s subtitled “179 things to do ’til the revolution.” I’m happy to report that my experiment here on The Picket Line makes the list as Thing #29:

“Let them march all they want, so long as they continue to pay their taxes.”Gen. Alexander Haig, Secretary of State under Ronald Reagan.

…I look at that quote from Alexander Haig, and it says 10,000 times what I could say. As long as we obey and pay, our masters don’t give a flying Philadelphia you-know-what about any of our worthless little opinions. And that goes double for our quaint little petitions, letters, and pleas in public forums.

No. If you don’t like what government does, you’ve got to stop supporting what government does.… ¶ The most sure and certain way to break the system is to refuse to be the system. If enough refuse to give their cooperation, the system falls. But even if you stand alone, you can live more easily with your own conscience if you do what you know to be right.…

29. An experiment in legal non-payment of taxes (but really much more than that)

, Dave Gross went on strike. He quit his job, lowered his income to a level at which he shouldn’t have to pay any income taxes — and began detailing the entire experiment on his Web site (http://www.sniggle.net/Experiment/) as a guide for others. His is a safe but adamant form of tax resistance — and he’s discovered that not only are there fewer problems than he anticipated, there are surprising lifestyle blessings, as well.

Tax resistance isn’t merely tax resistance. It’s about the moral and ethical choices we make every day when we accept individual responsibility for freedom. It’s about putting our beliefs into action in our everyday lives, rather than sitting snug in ivory towers, making up philosophies we never bother to apply.

Even if you have no intention of resisting taxes, but face other dilemmas trying to live free in a world where freedom’s outlawed, Dave offers insights.

I also manage to claim Thing #132 for the monkeywrenching techniques and examples I’ve cataloged at sniggle.net.

Some days I feel a little foolish making all this noise, yelling into the vast abyss that is the internet, spending so much time and effort on things that most people seemingly couldn’t be bothered to pass up a chance to see another picture of Paris Hilton with her shirt off for. Today is not one of those days.


Ray—

I read with interest your remarks about Cindy Sheehan’s vigil in Crawford, and your attempt to find ways that more of us can take a stronger stand in support of Sheehan’s struggle and the anti-war effort in general ["things we might consider doing to walk the talk"].

I’m surprised you didn’t mention war tax resistance as an option. That’s something we all can do that is in direct solidarity with Cindy Sheehan’s own tax resistance pledge and that firmly terminates our own reluctant support for the government policies we abhor.

I stopped paying federal income tax in March, 2003 when the invasion of Iraq began. I’m resisting the federal income tax completely and legally (by lowering my income below the tax line) but there are many ways to resist — some less completely, some less legally, some easier than others.

One war tax resister told me that it seems there are as many ways to do war tax resistance as there are war tax resisters — the point being that there’s a method for everyone and that anyone can join in to the extent of their ability, their level of commitment, the results they want to achieve and the amount of risk they want to take.

I hope you will consider war tax resistance as a possible avenue for people who want to expand their resistance.

I may end up having to turn this into a form letter, since there are so many other folks in the anti-war movement who could use this message.


I’ve written an article promoting tax resistance for the latest edition of Simple Living News:

Your War Doesn’t Fit Into My Budget:
Frugal Living As A Form Of Tax Resistance

Since I adopted a frugal lifestyle , of all the dumb, harmful, and worthless things I don’t miss wasting my money on, I don’t miss the war on Iraq the most.

, I quit my job and deliberately reduced my income to the point where I no longer owe federal income tax. I transformed my life, concentrating on what really matters, so that I can live within my means without paying federal income tax — honestly, peacefully, and legally.

American households have, on average, spent more than $4,000 apiece on the Iraq war (so far), and that’s just the extra costs of that war above and beyond what they spend to keep the military going year after year (another $5,000 per year per household).

By and large, these households spend this money whether they want to or not, because they don’t think they have a choice. At most, they grumble about “death and taxes” and they wish the politicians were nobler and wiser while they watch their paychecks get whittled down by the I.R.S.

But the times call for more than complaining and wishful thinking. We have to put as much of our effort as we can on the side of our values, instead of allowing so much of our effort to be stolen by the tax man and used to promote the values of politicians and the military/industrial complex.

As it says in Your Money Or Your Life, “when we go to our jobs we are trading our life energy for money.” When we pay taxes, the government is taking our life energy from us. If you live frugally on a low income, the I.R.S. takes less from you — so you can dedicate more to your own priorities.

In fact, when it comes to the personal income tax, about two-in-five American households live “under the tax line” and pay nothing at all. Opponents of the Iraq war and other government priorities would be wise to ask if they should endeavor to become part of this two-in-five.

There’s a long history of frugality being used in the arsenal of groups opposed to government policy — including the American “Founding Fathers”. , John Adams wrote home to his wife, “Frugality, my Dear, Frugality, Œconomy, Parcimony must be our Refuge. I hope the Ladies are every day diminishing their ornaments, and the Gentlemen too. Let us Eat Potatoes and drink Water. Let us wear Canvass, and undressed Sheepskins, rather than submit to the unrighteous, and ignominious Domination that is prepared for Us.”

Maybe it’s not time for another American Revolution just yet, but it’s certainly time for more Americans to put their money and their life energy where their hearts are.


I gave a little speech at a “die-in” at the San Francisco Federal Building:

Thank you for inviting me to speak . My name is David Gross and I’m with Northern California War Tax Resistance.

I understand that Nancy Pelosi has an office here, though she’s not here .

But I’d like you to imagine that she is here and that you could walk into her office right now and tell her all the reasons why she has to stop funding this horrible war.

But now imagine that Nancy Pelosi hears you out, then she stands up, leans over her desk, looks you in the eye and says, “You first.”

What would you say to that?

Because I’ve seen the opinion polls, and I know that most of the people in Pelosi’s district want her to stop funding the war. But I’ve also seen the IRS statistics, and I know that Nancy Pelosi’s constituents on average pay twice as much in federal taxes as the average American.

If Nancy Pelosi is refusing to cut off funding for the war, she’s representing her constituents very well, because they’re refusing too.

Too many of us in the anti-war movement are working for peace with one hand and for war with the other. We come to rallies and chant our chants, we wave our banners, we march, we write letters, we even block doors and block traffic and get arrested. But if we go back to work the next day and see part of each paycheck sent to the Pentagon, we’re working against our own values.

Look at your tax return this month and ask yourself how many hours you worked for the war machine, and how that compares to the hours you worked to stop it.

If we remain content to oppose the war with our voices while we support it with our taxes, we need to ask ourselves whether maybe we’ve really been war supporters all along.

Because before the first American boots hit the ground in the Iraq invasion, U.S. taxpayers had already struck Iraq in the form of the missiles and bombs — shock and awe that was bought and paid for by people like you and me.

And it’s people like you and me who have the power to stop this war, but only if we put all of our energy on the side of our values.

If we wait for the Democrats in Congress to stop funding the war, it’s going to be a long war. Bush isn’t attacking Iraq alone. Iraq isn’t under assault from 535 legislators in Washington. Iraq is being occupied by an army of American taxpayers and it’s way past time for us to stop the occupation!

Don’t wait for the politicians! We, ourselves, today can stop funding the war! We can put our money where our mouths are.

War tax resistance is direct action — one that we can do every day. It is a way to put all our life energy on the side of our values, instead of letting the tax collector force us to work for Pentagon priorities, politicians, and pork.

If you think war tax resistance is too difficult, dangerous, or impractical, trust me on this: you just need to learn more about it. There are many, many methods of war tax resistance — some are risky, others are not at all; some require civil disobedience, others are perfectly legal; some mean radical lifestyle change, others you could start doing today.

In the war tax resistance movement we often remark that there seem to be as many methods of war tax resistance as there are resisters. There is a method of war tax resistance for everybody — there is one that is right for you, that meets the goals you want to meet, with risks you can afford to take.

I urge you to contact us at NoWarTax.org — we have literature that can help you to learn more about your options, we run workshops periodically, and we do individual one-on-one counseling as well.

But most of all I urge you to stop funding the war machine! Not one more dollar, not one more death!


A new issue of NWTRCC’s newsletter — More Than a Paycheck — is out featuring an article I wrote about how to craft a persuasive and motivating tax resistance message. (It’s a distillation of a Picket Line entry from .)

Also in the newsletter are some notes about IRS policy and foibles, an update on the ongoing attempts by war tax resister Daniel Jenkins to find a legal forum that will rule that conscientious objection to military taxation is a human right, and the latest on All Saints Church’s struggle to maintain its freedom of speech and its tax-exempt status at the same time.

Daniel Sicken gives a report from the New England Regional Gathering of War Tax Resisters and Supporters. And some of those who gathered there — Ruthy Woodring, Aaron Falbel, Frances Crowe, and Daniel Staub — are profiled briefly. Here’s Frances Crowe’s profile:

“I suddenly woke up about five years ago and made a big sign that said ‘Does Our Lifestyle Demand War?’ and hung it on my door.” Frances then proceeded to work at changing her lifestyle, starting by not using her car for two days a week. As she walked more, she found she could use her car less and less — and liked walking more and more. It became something of a meditation, with the added bonus of meeting people along the way. She changed from a Friends Meeting that was some miles away to one within walking distance, and dropped her YMCA membership where they use so much heat and air conditioning. She doesn’t want to fly anymore and takes the train instead. She’s still working on many things, like buying food that is grown locally. She’s really working to reduce her footprint on the planet, and at the same time redirecting taxes from war to funding real human needs like schools, peace and justice work, and rebuilding the new society in the shell of the old.


I wrote a guest article for the Frugal For Life blog on Frugal Living as a Form of Tax Resistance:

Since I adopted a frugal lifestyle , of all the dumb, harmful, and worthless things I don’t miss wasting my money on, I don’t miss the war in Iraq the most.

, I quit my job and deliberately reduced my income to the point where I no longer owe federal income tax. I transformed my life, concentrating on what really matters, so that I can live within my means without paying this tax — honestly, peacefully, and legally.

American households have, on average, spent more than $4,500 apiece on the Iraq war so far — that doesn’t count the expenses we’ll continue to be racking up for veterans’ care and the cost of the ongoing occupation. And that’s just the extra costs of that war above and beyond what we spend to keep the world’s most gargantuan military going year after year (another $6,800 per year per household).

By and large, these households spend this money whether they want to or not because they don’t think we have a choice. At most, they grumble about “death and taxes” and wish the politicians were nobler and wiser while they watch their paychecks get whittled down by the IRS.

The times call for more than complaining and wishful thinking. We have to put as much of our effort as we can on the side of our values, instead of allowing so much of our effort to be stolen by the tax collector and used to promote the values of politicians and the military/industrial complex.

As it says in Your Money Or Your Life, “when we go to our jobs we are trading our life energy for money.” When we pay taxes, the government takes our life energy from us. If you live frugally on a low income, the IRS takes less from you — so you can dedicate more to your own priorities.

About two-in-five American households already live “under the tax line” and pay no federal income tax at all. Opponents of the Iraq war, and other people who know they can spend their money more wisely and justly than the government does, would be wise to ask if they should endeavor to become part of this two-in-five.

There’s a long history of frugality being used by groups opposed to government policy — including the American “Founding Fathers.” , John Adams wrote home to his wife, “Frugality, my Dear, Frugality, Œconomy, Parsimony must be our Refuge. I hope the Ladies are every day diminishing their ornaments, and the Gentlemen too. Let us Eat Potatoes and drink Water. Let us wear Canvass, and undressed Sheepskins, rather than submit to the unrighteous, and ignominious Domination that is prepared for Us.”

Even if it’s not time for another American Revolution just yet, it’s certainly time for more Americans to put their money, and their life energy, where their hearts are.

Comments to the post have ranged from interested to indignant, which is a good sign that my argument reached beyond the choir.


night I spoke at a meeting of The Abundance League, a group that was founded in San Francisco a few years ago and now has a few branches elsewhere.

It sounds a bit like a support group for superheroes who are trying to lose weight, but in reality it reminds me a lot more of a modern, California-style version of Benjamin Franklin’s Junto.

There were about twenty people in attendance, and after some informal meet-and-greet over pot luck snacks, we sat in a circle and introduced ourselves — sharing three things: our passions, our gifts, and our needs. The idea being that some people’s gifts and passions might be a perfect fit for other people’s needs.

The gifts and passions ranged from esoteric things like permaculture and neurolinguistic programming to more down-to-earth subjects like accounting and web design. Needs also ran the gamut from a good-paying job to a community that could usher in a paradigm shift.

After this set of introductions, it was my opportunity as the evening’s designated speaker “to share a passion, project or skill that creates abundance” in a fifteen-minute talk, followed by some discussion. Here’s what I said, more-or-less:

Thank you for inviting me to speak tonight about how I discovered an abundant life — how I started living more by working less, earning less, and spending less.

My story starts about five and a half years ago when I went in to the human resources department where I worked and asked if it would be possible for me to get a significant pay cut. “How significant?” they asked. I said I didn’t know, but probably something along the lines of 75%. As you can imagine, this was not the sort of request they were used to, but they gave it their best shot.

I should back up a bit and explain how I came to make such a strange request. Five and a half years ago was early , and at that time as you probably remember, the war on Iraq had become more-or-less inevitable. Along with many other people, I was horrified by the thought of the magnitude of the suffering the United States was about to inflict with its “shock and awe” campaign and at the increasingly blind, ignorant, and bloodthirsty belligerence that dominated our country.

But I was also painfully aware that as a taxpayer I was one small but vital part of the machine we were unleashing — that no matter how much I complained or voiced my moral opposition, as long as I continued to pay taxes, I was — in a practical, bottom-line sense — a war supporter.

Because of this, I had a hard time getting to sleep at night, and a hard time looking myself in the mirror in the morning. I knew I would have to stop supporting the war, if only for my own peace of mind.

The question was: how could I go about it? My major financial contribution to the military and the war came from paying the personal federal income tax. This tax was automatically withheld from each paycheck before I even saw it.

If I tried to stop this withholding, for instance by filing a new W-4 form with more allowances, this seemed like it would just be delaying the inevitable. Come April, the IRS would realize they’d been underfed and would come after me or my employer to seize the difference.

So I decided to see if I could get “under the tax line” — if I didn’t owe any tax to begin with, I wouldn’t have to pay and that would be the end of that. And so that’s why I went in to my H.R. department. As it turns out, they said they couldn’t help me — that such a move would look suspicious, as though they were trying to get away with something — and could cause problems of some sort for the company.

But as it turns out, I’m glad. I don’t think I would have wanted to continue to commute to a full-time, year-round job for an under-the-tax-line income if I could accomplish the same thing by just working fewer hours.

So I quit my job, where I’d been earning about $100,000 per year, and determined to get under the tax line. Now I’m self-employed, doing contract work and writing books.

At the time I started this experiment, I didn’t know where this “tax line” was. I assumed it was somewhere in the vicinity of the “poverty line,” which wasn’t a very encouraging thought.

When I did some initial research, I found some stories about war tax resisters who used this method — there are many methods of war tax resistance, this is just one of them — and these seemed to suggest that the “tax line” was somewhere around $3,000 to $8,000 of income per year.

So I started thinking “hmmm… I could buy bulk rice and pick dandelions for vitamins” … “you can do a lot with top ramen!” … “maybe I could work as a fire-spotter to avoid paying rent” … that sort of thing. I’d started to resign myself to the idea that the path I was on was going to be one of deprivation, sacrifice and renunciation in the service of my ideals. — There are things to be said for a path of sacrifice and renunciation in the service of ideals, but if that’s how things turned out, I’d probably be somewhere else, addressing the League of Renunciates tonight.

But instead I decided that first, I’d research tax law a little more closely, so as to find out more precisely where that “tax line” was and just how much of a budget I had to work with. What I found was a great relief.

Today in the United States, about one-third of households that file tax returns are already under the federal income tax line — that is to say, one-third of American households pay no federal income tax. If you take into account that those households tend to be larger on average (with more dependents, thus more deductions & credits), and if you take into account that some Americans earn so little income that they don’t file returns at all, that makes about 40% of Americans who are under the tax line. So I didn’t have to live in a cave and eat grubs and berries after all — all I had to do was become one of those two-in-five.

As it turns out, there really is no one “tax line.” It’s different for everyone, based on things like your family structure, your age, how you make your income, and what you do with your money.

For me, the tax line is about $30,000 per year. By using deductions for tax-deferred retirement accounts, for health savings accounts, in some years for tuition, and for legitimate business expenses, I’m able to — legally and by-the-book — pay no federal income tax.

To do this, I have to put about $14,000 into these retirement and health savings accounts. That leaves me about $16,000 to live on during the year. That seems like very little to many people, especially here in San Francisco where I live, but it’s more than enough for me. For one thing, it’s a real $16,000, not a $16,000 salary that then gets whittled down by income tax.

But my yearly expenses — rent, food, transportation, and the like — come to only about $12,000. What’s left over is a rainy-day, emergency, or vacation fund. I usually use it on a south-of-the-border vacation. And note that I’m also saving about $14,000 per year for retirement and for health expenses.

Here are some of the techniques I’ve adopted to lower my budget:

  • I cook my own meals from scratch rather than eating out or eating expensive packaged food.
  • I brew my own beer, because I like the good stuff (and I want to avoid the federal excise tax on alcoholic beverages).
  • I trade English tutoring for Spanish tutoring rather than paying for classes.
  • I use the public library for research & recreational reading rather than buying books.
  • I don’t own a car — which is such an expensive thing, especially here in the city — but I use City Car Share, public transit, bicycling, Greyhound, and such.
  • I try to find used stuff on freecycle / craigslist rather than buying new — for instance: a pot rack, a Foreman grill, our vacuum cleaner, a back door that I could cut a cat door in without risking our security deposit, a bread machine, speakers for our DVD player, our living room couch, some lectures on video tape, our food processor and blender, and a carboy I use for brewing.

So how do I feel about my life now that I’ve gone from the $100,000 a year urban playboy lifestyle to living on $12,000? Money Magazine profiled me briefly a few months ago for an article they put out on how to avoid paying taxes. They concluded that their readers probably wouldn’t enjoy what they called the “ascetic lifestyle” that comes along with my technique.

If this is “asceticism,” asceticism is very underrated. The life I’m leading now is fuller and more enjoyable than ever, I have less anxiety and feel more integrity, and I’m genuinely living a life of abundance.

By being willing to take in less income, I am able to work fewer hours. It turns out that, to me, those free hours are much more valuable than the money I’d been trading them for.

It seems that many of the things people commonly give up, in order to pursue careers and more money, are more valuable than the money we gain in the trade. Not only are they more valuable, but many are not for sale at any price! Our health, our youth, and the time we need to pursue our dreams, learn new skills, strengthen relationships with our family and friends and communities, or just to read those books we’ve been meaning to get around to.

Money, unless you collect it as examples of the art of engraving, is at best a means to various ends. It is these ends, and not the money itself, that define abundance. And while money can be very useful as a means to some of these ends, it is hopeless for others, and inefficient for many. And not only that, but the pursuit of money can take up so much time and energy that it makes it more difficult to pursue some of those ends.

How does it make sense to spend extra hours at work to earn enough money to pay for a gym membership so you can lose the pounds you’ve put on from sitting in your desk chair all those extra hours at work?

How does it make sense to work extra hours so you can afford a meal in a nice restaurant once in a while because you don’t have time after all those extra hours at work to shop and cook and do the dishes if you want to do it yourself?

I love good food. When I was making the big bucks I used to go out to eat all the time, because there are so many great restaurants in San Francisco. But for the cost of one restaurant meal, I could eat fantastic food all week — if only I had the time to shop for the ingredients, look up the recipes, prepare the food, and clean up the kitchen afterwards. Now I have that time, and so I eat great food just about every day for a fraction of what I used to spend.

One measure of abundance is this: what percentage of your time and energy — what percentage of your life — are you able to devote to your passions, and what percentage are you forced to spend on priorities that contradict and oppose them. Now, by “your passions” I don’t just mean “your own selfish interests” but your values, the things you think are worthwhile and important.

If a percentage of your paycheck is being sucked up by Uncle Sam, you’re spending that percent of every working day using your energy and your time — spending your life — to promote the Pentagon’s priorities and political pork projects.

What worked for me won’t necessarily work for everyone. Some people, for very good reasons, have higher expenses than I do — for instance, children, though they are good tax deductions, I understand can be something of an expensive hobby. I don’t have kids. Also, not everyone has job skills that translate well to a part-time, contract, work-from-home style job. And many people have to work full-time jobs, year-round to earn what I earn.

I haven’t come here tonight with a one-size-fits-all strategy for abundance and fulfillment. But, there are some lessons I learned along the way that many of us can use to make our lives better, whatever our situation.

So I urge you to take stock of your own vision of an abundant life, and look closely at which components of it are best-served by earning money and which components are best-served in more direct ways. Look also for ways in which your career may be interfering with a more abundant life. And look especially at how the government, by means of the tax system, is forcing you to expend your time and energy on priorities that contradict your own.

And consider the possibility that the most abundant life you could be living may be one in which you are earning and spending less but living more.

I simplified some things and left some loose ends hanging. There’s a lot more I could have covered and many more gaps I could have filled in, but I was supposed to hold it down to fifteen minutes and I think this just barely fit.

The talk went well, I think, and the discussion afterwards was excited and heated and threatened to keep going long after we needed to wrap things up and close down the meeting. I gave away a few copies of NWTRCC’s “Low Income/Simple Living as War Tax Resistance” pamphlet, and had discussions with a number of people who had more detailed questions about how I do what I do, and how they might be able to incorporate some of the same sort of techniques into their lives.

This “Abundance League” seems like a good group to know — energetic, enthusiastic, idealistic people with an itch to strive and improve and give a helping hand.


Some bits-and-pieces from here-and-there:

  • My talk at The Abundance League on “Discovering An Abundant Life” has been reprinted in the latest issue of Simple Living News.
  • Anarch.me is a community of individuals who volunteer their time and talent to promote a voluntary society. We invite you to join us.” It seems to be quickly attracting some of the better talent in the on-line voluntaryist / left libertarian / agorist circles.
  • The Marina-Huerta Educational Foundation caught my eye. It “is dedicated to exploring various aspects of a sustainable lifestyle. This encompasses affordable, appropriate, intermediate technologies in a number of areas, such as housing, energy, wastes, foods, and education, in both the developed and less developed world.” According to William Marina, the project takes inspiration from Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged and hopes to plant the seeds of little self-sufficient “Galt’s Gulch”es all around the world. They’re currently working on a prototype in Guatemala:

    We would suggest that the State has the means today, and did at the time that Atlas Shrugged was written, to seek out and destroy any “secret” community such as Galt’s Gulch. What the State cannot do however, either in this country or in other nations such as Guatemala, where we recently completed a community center which will be at the center of a new village eventually housing 800 families, is to prevent individuals from building the kind of houses we suggest, along with new sources of decentralized energy, using the Sun and wind to develop Electricity, as well as utilizing rainwater and reusing gray water, along with more efficient kinds of waste disposal, all of which can contribute to growing one’s own food supplies. Thus, many people can openly, but without fanfare, begin to withdraw from essential cooperation with the State.


The latest issue of New Escapologist includes an article I wrote to introduce the practical technique of tax resistance. Regular Picket Line readers won’t likely be surprised by anything therein, as I’ve covered the same themes in similar terms hereabouts.

Buying My Life Back by Putting My Money Where My Mouth Is

When Dubya’s “Coalition of the Willing” invaded Iraq in , I quit my job in order to get under the income tax line so that I would no longer be paying for such things.

Like many people, in the days before the invasion I was horrified at the thought of the suffering we were about to inflict with our “shock and awe” campaign, and at the increasingly blind, ignorant, and bloodthirsty belligerence that dominated my country. But I knew that as a taxpayer I was a small but vital part of the machine we were unleashing. I knew that no matter how much I complained or voiced my moral opposition, as long as I continued to pay taxes I was — in a practical, bottom-line sense — a war supporter.

I decided to put my money where my mouth is. Today I’m under the income tax line. I’ve learned how to live within my means without paying federal income tax — honestly, peacefully, and legally. I resist other taxes, like excise taxes or the “social-security tax,” in other ways (honestly and peacefully, but not always legally).

I’m through with symbolic, feel-good, bumper-sticker activism; I’ve taken Phil Ochs’s “I ain’t a-marchin’ anymore” to heart and I’ve left the “peace parade” marches and rallies with their tired chants and terrible speakers behind. I take a practical approach, learning about the tax laws and about how to live well by being down-to-earth and sensibly frugal.

Here are some of the techniques I’ve adopted to lower my budget:

  • I cook my own meals from scratch rather than eating out or eating expensive packaged food (I’ve found that now that I have the time, I really enjoy cooking).
  • I brew my own beer, because I like the good stuff (and because I want to avoid the federal excise tax on alcoholic beverages).
  • I trade English tutoring for Spanish tutoring rather than paying for classes.
  • I use the public library for research & recreational reading instead of buying books.
  • I don’t own a car — which is such an expensive thing, especially in San Francisco where I live — but I buy in to a short-term car rental co-op for rare occasions when I need a car, and use public transit, bicycling, and such otherwise.
  • I try to find used stuff on freecycle or craigslist rather than buying new — for instance, off the top of my head: a pot rack, a Foreman grill, our vacuum cleaner, a back door that I could cut a cat door in without risking our security deposit, a bread machine, speakers for our DVD player, our living room couch, some sets of lectures on tape, our food processor and blender, and a carboy I use for brewing.
  • I’ve joined a community of tax resisters in the United States who meet periodically to share stories and ideas for resisting in better ways.

How do I feel about my life now that I’ve gone from a $100,000-a-year urban playboy lifestyle to living on around $12,000? Money Magazine profiled me briefly a while back for an article they put out on how to avoid paying taxes. They concluded that their readers probably wouldn’t enjoy what they called the “ascetic lifestyle” that comes along with my technique.

If this is “asceticism,” asceticism is very underrated. The life I’m leading now is fuller and more enjoyable than ever, I have less anxiety (and less guilt about my taxes) and feel more integrity, and I’m genuinely living a life of abundance.

For one thing, by being willing to take in less income, I am able to work fewer hours. It turns out that, to me, those free hours are much more valuable than the money I’d been trading them for — and the more practice I get in living vigorously, the more valuable my free time becomes to me. Now, more of what I do with my life is for goals I think are valuable, useful, and interesting; much less is what I have to put up with for a paycheck.

It seems that many of the things people commonly give up, in order to pursue careers and more money, are more valuable than the money we gain in the trade. Not only are they more valuable, but many are not for sale at any price! — our health, our youth, and the time we need to pursue our dreams, to learn new skills, to strengthen relationships with our family and friends and communities, or just to read those books we’ve been meaning to get around to.

One measure of abundance is this: what percentage of your time and energy — what percentage of your life — are you able to devote to your passions, and what percentage are you forced to spend on priorities that contradict and oppose them? By “your passions” I don’t just mean “your own selfish whims” but your values, the things you think are worthwhile and important.

If a percentage of your paycheck is being sucked up by the government, you’re spending that percent of every working day using your energy and your time — spending your life — to promote the government’s priorities. It may very well be that, instead, you can live more and promote your own priorities more by working less, earning less, and spending less.

What worked for me won’t necessarily work for everyone. Some people, for very good reasons, have higher expenses than I do — children, for instance, though they are good tax deductions, can be something of an expensive hobby; I don’t have kids. And not everyone has job skills that translate well to a part-time, contract-based, work-from-home style job. Many people have to work full-time jobs, all-year-round to earn what I earn.

I don’t have a one-size-fits-all strategy for abundance and fulfillment. But what I’ve learned is that by taking more direct responsibility for your life and your effect on the world, by radically reassessing how your activities relate to your priorities, and by backing away from the consumer and job cultures, you can make your own life better and reduce your complicity in making other peoples’ lives suck.

So I urge you to take stock of your own vision of an abundant life, to look closely at which components of it are best-served by earning money and which components are best-served in more direct ways, and to look also for ways in which your career may be interfering with a more abundant life.

And I urge you to look also at how the government, by means of the tax system, is forcing you to expend your time and energy on priorities that contradict your own. Consider the possibility that the best life you could be living may be one in which you are earning and spending less but living more.

Since I wrote this article, we’ve given up our City Car Share co-op membership. My sweetie’s job moved down the peninsula and now she has her own car for the commute that we also now use for whatever occasional car trips we used to use City Car Share for.


Living Nonviolence featured a guest essay on war tax resistance by yours truly yesterday:

Living Nonviolence Through Tax Resistance

When the government of the United States and its allies launched its “shock and awe” terror campaign against the people of Iraq, I quit my job and reduced my income and expenses so that I could live below the income tax-paying threshold and stop my financial support of the U.S. war machine.

I realized that it wasn’t enough for me to say that I disapproved of the war, or that I wouldn’t put on a uniform and go carry it out. In matters like this, the government relies on our practical, financial support more than on our moral support… more even than on the support of those who directly carry out the politicians’ orders.

Thoreau wrote:

I have heard some of my townsmen say, “I should like to have them order me out to help put down an insurrection of the slaves, or to march to Mexico, — see if I would go;” and yet these very men have each, directly by their allegiance, and so indirectly, at least, by their money, furnished a substitute. The soldier is applauded who refuses to serve in an unjust war by those who do not refuse to sustain the unjust government which makes the war…

In this way, at least, the “peace movement” hasn’t changed much since , when Thoreau wrote this passage in Civil Disobedience. By and large, pacifists and anti-war “activists” disapprove of war, parade and preach against it, but pay for it all the while.

That wasn’t going to be good enough for me. I was having a hard time sleeping at night, and a hard time looking myself in the mirror in the morning. I knew that as long as the government had my practical support, my refusal of moral support was just for show. To follow my conscience I would have to put my money where my mouth is.

I decided to withdraw my practical support as well, particularly my taxes. I started working for my values instead of against them. I quit my job and deliberately reduced my income to the point where I no longer owe federal income tax. I transformed my life, concentrating on what really matters, so that I could live well and securely on a lower income. (As a bonus, I came to find that my lower-income lifestyle was more fun, fulfilling, and interesting than the life I had been leading before.)

I went in to tax resistance blindly, following a moral imperative rather than a how-to guide. I’ve since learned that there are many different methods of tax resistance, and that you can find a wealth of information and accumulated experience about using these methods from the National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee. Over the last several years, I’ve been refining my tax resistance by listening to the advice of people who have been doing this for decades.

People in war tax resistance circles sometimes remark that there seem to be about as many methods of tax resistance as there are resisters. This can make it confusing to talk about “war tax resistance” as though it meant one particular technique, but the plus side to this is that there are many techniques to choose from, depending on things like your family, job, and financial situation, what goals you want to achieve, and what risks you are willing to confront.

Sometimes otherwise well-meaning people discourage tax resistance by pointing out good things that the government does with our money. The U.S. government may spend as much as the rest of the world combined on the military, may threaten everybody with the world’s most fearsome arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, may shamelessly practice torture, may imprison on a mass scale, may have military outposts all across the globe — but if we stop paying taxes, won’t we also stop our contributions to such worthy collective projects as social security, health care, support for education and transportation, food stamps, environmental regulation, and the like?

When I hear this argument, I try to imagine a favorite charity: maybe Amnesty International, or Habitat for Humanity, or Doctors Without Borders… something like that. What if I learned that my favorite charity were spending half of the donations I send to them on a campaign of murder, brutality, and torture? Would I continue to send them checks to support the good things they were doing with the other half of my money, or would I find another charity to support?

Nothing about tax resistance prevents you from contributing your time and money to beneficial projects. It just means that you intend to do so in a way that doesn’t also contribute to the plague of government-led violence.

If I want to be nonviolent, disapproving of violence is not enough, not lifting my hand to strike another person is not enough, even chasing violent intentions from my heart is not enough: I have to consciously trace the practical effects of my actions, including my superficially nonviolent actions, through to their effects. People who think of themselves as nonviolent may be torturing, maiming, and murdering by writing checks and licking stamps, or by remaining passive when a portion of each paycheck is withheld for war — “just following orders” like any other garden-variety war criminal.

We know that there are places in Nevada where people sit at computers and fire drone-based weapons half a world away. Their physical distance from the anguish they inflict does not amount to a moral shield. The same is true for those of us who send the checks to buy the drones — another essential link in the same chain.

Living nonviolence means striving to live 100% of our lives nonviolently, not just the percentage the government deigns to let us keep after taxes. War tax resistance is an essential technique for pursuing the goal of a nonviolent life and a just, peaceful world.