How you can resist funding the government → the tax resistance movement → publications → posters

Some posters promoting war tax resistance have started showing up around San Francisco. Here are a couple:

“Who pays for war? 49% of your taxes at work.”
«¿Por Qué Nuestros Impuestos Destruyen Casas y No Las Construyen?»

Here’s another picture showing more of the posters promoting war tax resistance that have been appearing around town in San Francisco.


The well-designed and highly educational Death and Taxes Poster has been re-issued for the budget.

If you want to start a discussion of budget priorities, this’ll do the trick.


I’m back! We had a great time in Mexico, and now I’m unpacking and reassuring our cat that we still love him and trying to get caught up on what I missed while we were away.

Here are some of the things I would have been covering at The Picket Line had I not been off-the-grid:

  • The War Resisters League is promoting a blockade of the IRS headquarters in Washington on . “Just as military recruiters supply the bodies for the war, the IRS supplies the funding. Just as some soldiers have the courage to resist the war, we — as tax payers — should have the courage to resist paying the taxes that send soldiers to war. We call on all war opponents to help dramatize our opposition and to disrupt business as usual by joining this nonviolent blockade.”
  • The Observer has a good article about the anti-Pizzo movement in Palermo. Fabio Messina has opened a supermarket that only stocks goods supplied by shops and producers who refuse to pay protection money to the mafia.

    The store is part of an anti-Mafia groundswell that started four years ago when activists plastered Palermo with bill stickers stating: “An entire population that pays the pizzo is a population without dignity.”

    That spawned “Addiopizzo,” an organisation promoting stores and suppliers that publicly vowed to pay no more. Today, 9,000 Palermitans are registered customers and the list contains 241 businesses, 30 of which have their products on Messina’s shelves.

    Punto Pizzofree also stocks produce from farms seized from jailed Mafia bosses including Salvatore “The Beast” Riina.

    The Sicilian Mafia, on the back foot since the arrest in of fugitive godfather Bernardo Provenzano, was hurt again when powerful industrial association Confindustria said it would expel any members paying protection money.

  • Long-time war tax resister Joanna Karl has died. Friends remember that “To a rare degree, Joanna truly did walk her talk. And she did it with a big smile!”
  • A paper by Odd-Helge Fjeldstad and Joseph Semboja — “Why people pay taxes: The case of the development levy in Tanzania” — is now available on-line and provides a few more clues for those of us who like to investigate the factors that promote tax compliance or tax resistance.
  • War tax resisters in Farmington, Maine held a workshop recently. Resisters including Eileen Kreutz, Eileen Liddy, Henry Braun, and Larry Dansinger shared their experiences. “Since Congress continues to fund the war despite all our letter writing, demonstrations, and protests, I am joining others to try to affect the war funding directly by not paying all of my taxes,” Liddy said. “This is more than just symbolism. Legislators need to know that people are ready to engage in nonviolent civil disobedience in order to get them to do the job they are elected to do.”
  • Pente Player, in the comments here at The Picket Line, has done some back-of-the-envelope calculations to see what effect this year’s economic stimulus package will have on those of us who are trying to stay under the federal income tax line.
  • San Francisco area artist Doug Minkler has created another war tax resistance-themed poster featuring a paraphrase of William Reich: “People tend to ascribe the responsibility for war to those who wield power. But the responsibility for wars falls directly upon the citizenry, for they possess all the necessary means to avert war. To place guilt on ordinary people — to hold them solely responsible — means to take them seriously, whereas, to view them as victims means to treat them as small, helpless children.”
  • The essay Tax Resistance: The Moral and Legal Defense from redpill8 has been bouncing around blogland since it was posted late last month. It asserts that you have a legal obligation to stop paying taxes to the U.S. government in order to keep from being considered an accomplice in its criminal behavior.
  • Raleigh Booze at Sword of Peace shares his conscientious objector statement and discusses how tax resistance fits in to a Christian conscientious objection position.
  • SFGate caught my eye with its article on “How to be a foodie without breaking the bank.”


More news from the war tax resistance movement in Spain:

About 20 taxpayers from Pallars have resisted their military taxes.

The Tax Resistance Assembly of Pallars (Jussà and Sobirà) has completed the annual campaign with the presentation of the Collective Declaration of War Tax Resistance. Ten taxpayers have addressed, jointly, a letter to the tax office in Lleida in order to express their refusal to contribute to military spending, which, according to the General State Budget, is 4.7% for the Ministry of Defense, but can also be found camouflaged in spending for Science and Technology, Industry, R&D, National Guard, international cooperation (Afghanistan War, Kosovo, Colombia…)

, at least eight additional taxpayers have opted to present their declaration of resistance in their own way.

In all, 1,418.84 euros have been rescued and have been allocated to the common project of the campaign this year, in support of the movement of refuseniks and conscientious objectors in Paraguay and of other peace and development initiatives.

The Tax Resistance Assembly of Pallars treasures the positive and helpful manner of this year’s campaign. They report that talks have been held in Sort, La Pobla de Segur, and Tremp, and 350 posters have been put up, indicating that in some places they didn’t last 24 hours.

The number of people who resist war taxes has increased in the two Pallars, by about 15% per year, they reported.

In a communique, the assembly considers it “an insult to the intelligence to speak of [economic] crisis in order to justify cutting social investment when with the cost of three Leopard tanks a hospital can be built and operated or the worth of two Tomahawk missiles could run a school.”

“Exports of the Spanish military industry, principally in private hands, have grown 44%, selling to Morocco, Israel, Venezuela, Thailand, Brazil, Cuba, Ghana, Mauritania, Senegal, Georgia, Syria, and Iran,” they reported.


The Vote

From the issue of The Vote:

Poster Campaign

…Income tax resisters will find “Twentieth Century Robbery,” “No Vote No Tax,” and “The Paid Piper,” especially applicable to their case.…

Also from the issue of The Vote:

John Hampden Statue at Aylesbury.

The statue of John Hampden, presented to the county of Buckinghamshire by Mr. James Griffiths, of Long Marston, in commemoration of the Coronation, was unveiled at Aylesbury on by Lord Rothschild. There was a large gathering, representative of Buckinghamshire generally. After some difficulty the Women’s Tax Resistance League received the assurance that they would be able to pay their last tribute to the great Tax Resister.

At the close of the unveiling ceremony a procession of members of the League crossed the market square to the statue, the crowd readily making way, while police lined the short route. On behalf of the League, two delegates, Miss Gertrude Eaton and Miss Clemence Housman, laid a beautiful wreath at the foot of the statue. It was made of white flowers, on which, in black letters, were the words, “From Women Tax Resisters.” Within the circle of flowers was a ship in full sail with the name of John Hampden in gold letters on the streamers. The ship was made of brown beech leaves (the beech is the tree most famous in Buckinghamshire) and white flowers. Emblems were also laid at the base of the statue from the Irishwomen’s Franchise League [this was corrected in a later issue; it was actually from the Irish League for Women’s Suffrage] (a harp in Maréchal Niel roses), the Gymnastic Teachers’ S.S. (blue immortelles and silver leaves), and the London Graduates Union (a laurel wreath). Among those present were Mrs. [Myra Eleanor] Sadd Brown, Mrs. [Mary] Sergeant Florence, Dr. Kate Haslam, Mrs. [Ethel] Ayres Purdie, Mrs. [Margaret] Kineton Parkes, Miss [Minnie?] Turner, M.A., Miss [Maud?] Roll, Mr. Lee and Mr. Sergeant.

Tax Resistance: The Situation at Bromley.

“My goods are not yet seized for non-payment of taxes. I am still barricaded.

Outside the gate!

“A most uncomfortable position for the tax collector! But, while offering sympathy, I feel the experience will be beneficial. There is nothing so enlightening as a little ‘fellow-feeling.’ Nothing like going ‘there’ to learn the discomforts of being where the woman is, and should be, according to the gospel of the man at Westminster. Bolts and bars are never pleasant things to deal with — from outside! They are terribly, cruelly hard to remove when fixed by men driven by fear to protect an unjust wall of separation. But walls must yield to pressure, and the women gather, intent on ‘breaking down’; content, if need be, to ‘be broken.’ While men, relying on their fastenings, ignore the trembling of foundations, women know the wall is doomed, and when it falls they will flock in to do the bidding of the “Anti” — to scrub and clean, to mind the babies, to stay in the home — the National Home.”

K[ate]. Harvey.

Meetings in the Market-square, Bromley.

Meetings are now being held every evening in the Market-square, Bromley, and are exciting wide interest. Mrs. [Charlotte] Despard was the speaker at the first, and told the crowd why Mrs. Harvey was making this emphatic protest against taxation without representation. Mrs. Despard’s own experiences aroused much interest. The following evening Mrs. [Isabel] Tippett spoke, and still larger crowds gathered to hear her. By news of these regular meetings had spread, and the audience was ready to receive the speakers. The “Antis” are showing themselves — a sure sign of our success — but the chief argument they bring forward, in the form of questions, is that of physical force: because women do not fight they should not vote. Mrs. Merivale Mayer, the speaker on , was able to show how beneficial the women’s vote had proved in Australia, and told of the surprise of Australian politicians that the Mother Country still refuses to give the women the chance to stand side by side with men in the fight against evil. The police are exceedingly kind — and evidently interested.

More Tax Resisters.

On , at Redding, goods belonging to Professor Edith Morley were sold. Speakers: Mrs. [Anne] Cobden Sanderson, Miss Gertrude Eaton. Also goods belonging to Miss Manuelle, at Harding’s Auction Rooms, Victoria Station, W. Speakers: Mrs. [Caroline] Louis Fagan, Mrs. Cobden Sanderson, Dr. [C.V.] Drysdale; and at Working, silver, the property of Mrs. Skipwith, was sold. Speakers: Mrs. [Barbara] Ayrton Gould, Mrs. Kineton Parkes. On , at Southend, silver belonging to Mrs. Douglas Hameton and Mrs. [Rosina] Sky was sold. There was a procession with brass band prior to sale, and also a very successful protest meeting. Speakers: Mrs. Cobden Sanderson, Mrs. Kineton Parkes, Mr. Warren.

Also from the issue of The Vote:

Watch the Authorities!

The need for women to be on the watch is strikingly shown in the news of her experiences which has been sent us by Miss Clara Lee, of Thistledown, Letchworth, who points out how she forced an admission of error from the Inland Revenue Authorities. She writes thus:—

As a tax resister, the following experiences prove the carelessness of Government officials. Having refused to pay Inhabited House Duty (8s. 9d.) to the local collector, I was reported by him to the surveyor for this district, who sent a demand containing two inaccuracies. I wrote to point that one ought not to have occurred, seeing that we had had compulsory education since ; the other, he would see did not agree with the original:—

Local Demand.
s.d.
Schedule A50
House Duty89
Surveyor’s Demand.
£s.d.
Schedule A050
Schedule B115
House Duty089

Schedule B, I found, applied to nurseries and market gardens. So I wrote pointing out that the nearest connection I had to either, was that under the Lloyd George Insurance Act I was classed with agricultural labourers. To this I received the following letter:—

4, Cardiff-road, Luton, .

Inland Revenue — Surveyor of Taxes.

Madam, — Referring to your letter of , I much regret that £1 1s. 5d. was included upon your demand note in error — the entry relating to the next person upon the collector’s return. — Yours faithfully,

(Signed) G.R. Simpson.

Is this the exactness of the work for which women, as well as men, pay so heavily? How long would a commercial firm exist, if it allowed such errors? How long would the public tolerate such mistakes by women workers in our hospitals and elsewhere? The title of idiot, lunatic and criminal must revert to the people responsible for such a condition of things. The 8s. 9d. Inhabited House Duty has now been deducted from my claim of return Income-tax; this seems an unusual proceeding.


The Vote

From the issue of The Vote:

Tax Resistance.

Mrs. Harvey’s Protest.

A great gathering assembled at Brackenhill to support Mrs. Kate Harvey in her spirited protest against the Insurance Act. A decorated brake, adorned with Women’s Freedom League and Women’s Tax-Resistance League banners, started from Headquarters’ Office at , conveying some twenty-seven persons, among whom were Mesdames Huntsman, [Anne] Cobden Saunderson, Tanner, Mustard, Catmur, Pierotti, Green, Ball, Kux, Presbury, Johnson, Sanders, Pyart, Watson, Spiller, Sutcliffe, Moser, Miss [Florence] Underwood, Misses [Nina] Boyle, Sanders, St Clair, and Lawrence. Miss F.A. Underwood and Dr. [Elizabeth] Knight, who went down by train, were accompanied by other members, and at the Bromley Police-court were joined by Mrs. Snow, Mrs. Terry, Mrs. and Miss [Emma] Fox Bourne, Mrs. Fisher, and other well-known members of the League.

Mrs. Harvey, charged on ten counts with neglecting to insure William David Asquith under the provisions of the National Insurance Act, pleaded guilty and said she did not mean to pay. Asquith was put in the box to prove that his employer had refused to stamp his card; and the solicitor for the Insurance Commissioners pressed for “special costs” on the strange ground that there was no defence and that therefore the “public” should not be at the cost of such a prosecution. Allusion was also made to Mrs. Harvey’s well-known “objection” to paying taxes of any kind.

Mrs. Harvey then spoke. She said: “I am not resisting the Act as an Act. If it had come straight down from heaven I should resist it just the same. I am doing what every business man throughout the country does as a matter of course — I refuse to pay for goods which I cannot choose.”

Continuing, Mrs. Harvey insisted on her right to choose the men who went to Westminster to make the laws. “I am here because of my right to choose clean-living men to make those laws, to save women from prostitution, to make life more safe and our streets more safe for women and girls — aye, for our children even. I stand here because I refuse to break the law — the law has declared that there can be no taxation without the right of representation.”

After consultation the magistrates imposed the vindictive sentence of £1 for each offence, £10; arrears of insurance due to Asquith, 5s. 10d.; court fees, £4 10s.; and “special” costs (which we presume to be the solicitor’s own fees), £2 2s.; total, £16 17s. 10d.

Before leaving the dock Mrs. Harvey reiterated her intention not to pay. “I would rather die first,” she exclaimed in a burst of fierce indignation as she addressed the Bench. “I stand for justice, and this is injustice, an injustice which will hang round your necks like a millstone and drown you in your own incapacity and folly.” Loud cries of “Shame!” from the Suffragists in court greeted the sentence, and Mrs. Harvey’s concluding remarks were applauded.

The entire party was entertained to lunch and tea at Brackenhill, and in the afternoon a poster parade, with alternate W.F.L. and W.T.R. posters, was organised by Mrs. Huntsman. The placards were inscribed, “We Refuse to Break the Law,” “Taxation of the Unrepresented is not Government, it is Tyranny,” “We Refuse to Pay for Goods We Cannot Choose.”

In the market-place a mass meeting was held at , with Miss Anna Munro in the chair. A large, expectant crowd gathered long before the hour, and it is a significant fact that the extreme hostility so characteristic of other meetings at Bromley was conspicuously absent. A sea of upturned, attentive faces listened without interruption to Miss Munro, who went over the grounds on which women demand the Vote; and Mrs. [Margaret] Kineton Parkes, who as representing the Women’s Tax-Resistance League, pointed out that women resisted the Act as women, as voteless women, and as tax-paying women; and to Miss Nina Boyle, who summed up the position and set forth the policy of the Women’s Freedom League.

That Waggon!

On , Dr. Knight’s famous hay waggon was sold again at Woodbridge — this time to recover the amount of her dog license and of the costs connected with the case. Mrs. [Isabel] Tippett, Mrs. Lane, and Miss [Marguerite A.] Sidley represented the Women’s Freedom League. Before the sale Miss Sidley addressed the market, explaining the circumstances of the sale and the reasons for tax resistance. Afterwards Mrs. Tippett gave a most excellent and telling speech which was listened to with the greatest attention. While waiting by the waterside for their train our members listened with much interest to an animated discussion on the merits and demerits of tax resistance, and the speeches of the afternoon and of the preceding evening when the Suffrage Pilgrims were at Woodbridge. The waggon has done duty so often that it has now become historic in the Suffrage Cause; future generations will, no doubt, rank it with John Hampden’s ship.

Dr. Knight is also resisting the Insurance Act, and has received several calls from harassed officials. She has arranged to meet them at some future date to discuss the whole question.

Land Tax Resisted.

Miss Boyle has forwarded to the District Valuer of Worcester the following communication in relation to the Inland Revenue “Forms” sent to her in valuation of property in that neighbourhood:—

Sir,— I am exceedingly obliged to you for the interesting collection of Forms 7, 17, 35 and 36 which you have been good enough to send me from time to time. I trust you will continue and send me many more.

As for the provisional valuation being correct, I should think that in the last degree unlikely. But as I have not the slightest intention of paying anything whatever to the Government so long as women remain unenfranchised, that is a question we need not go into for the present. — Faithfully yours,

C. Nina Boyle.


Some bits and pieces from here and there:

  • The JustSeeds Artists’ Cooperative is selling a war tax resistance propaganda poster produced by the War Resisters League, in the early 1980s (they believe).
  • A website calling itself IRS Doghouse aims to let people rate and check up on the ratings of IRS employees.