Some historical and global examples of tax resistance → United States → Louisiana during reconstruction, 1872–79 → Edward Booth

Around , white residents of Louisiana, angered by the continuing rule of the black/carpetbagger state government that had been suppressing white supremacist rule since the end of the American Civil War, met to organize a tax strike.

These documents, though they seem to have been collected from multiple sources, come from Louisiana Affairs, the report of a House of Representatives select committee on “the condition of The South.”

The Mass-Meeting for Resistance to Tax-Collections, 1872.

The meeting, called by a large number of citizens, to resist the collection of local taxes, filled Odd-Fellow’s Hall last night to its utmost capacity, and the reporter is assured by those who were near the entrance that thousands were unable to obtain admission. The meeting contained representatives from every respectable class — industrial, commercial, and professional — but was composed chiefly of those who, being the owners of property, are the immediate tax-payers.

It was nearly eight o’clock when the meeting proceeded to business, and it was full eleven when it adjourned. The assemblage was called to order by Mr. Benjamin F. Florence, who briefly stated the object of the demonstration, and the following officers were chosen:

The officers listed included Dr. Daniel Warren Brickell, president, Edward Booth, secretary, and dozens of “vice-presidents.”

Dr. Brickell, upon taking the chair, after some prefatory remarks, in the course of which he observed that he had been twenty-four years in New Orleans, working for a livelihood, as he presumed most of his hearers had, and paying his dues to the government, as no doubt all his audience had done, and now he was selected for the chairmanship of the association, because he was opposed to the payment of any taxes whatever. [Applause.] In taking this responsible position, he wished it to be clearly known that he did it with the understanding that those he was addressing would stand by him in refusing to pay taxes, and would refuse to the bitter end. [Applause.]

They were told by the veteran office-holder who fills the post of administrator of finance for the city, that the man who refused to pay taxes was not a good citizen. The Times said they were dogs if they paid taxes, and they were fools if they didn’t. While they saw public officers growing rich in a very short time, and the people becoming poor as the officers grew rich, was it not time to put a stop to such a system of government? They had a newspaper that was everything to-day, another thing to-morrow — another thing to-day and everything to-morrow — a newspaper, the man who owns which, whatever his hired writers may be, “is not one of us, has no sympathies with us, is against us, for the burdens that afflict us do not bear upon him.” This newspaper told the people that it was a costly experiment to resist tax-paying — that an effort of the kind which failed had cost $67,000. Dr. Brickell, for his part, would pay his share of a million of dollars to get rid of the carpet-baggers and villains who were consuming the substance of the people, and he would consider it very cheap if the thing would be thoroughly done at that price. The Times said wait until the fall, honest men would be elected to the legislature, and then all would be right. Dr. Brickell commenting upon this, said he would prefer to keep his money until honest men were elected rather than put it in that fiscal agency on Camp street. [Great applause.]

Mr. Booth, chairman of the committee on resolutions, consisting of, besides himself, Messrs. Benj. Florence, E. Conery, L. Schneider, Hugh McCloskey, Archibald Mitchell, John G. Fleming, W.C. Black, A. Carriere, and W. Freret, submitted the following resolutions, which were unanimously adopted and enthusiastically applauded from time to time as they were being read. The meeting was addressed successively by Messrs. Booth and Wm. M. Randolph, Judge J.B. Cotton, and Julien Michel, and J.Q.A. Fellows. The meeting adjourned at so late an hour that the abstracts of the speeches of these gentlemen, which we had prepared, cannot be printed before the paper goes to press, and are, therefore, laid over.

Besides the resolutions appended one was adopted requesting the people of the rural parishes to join in the movement against tax-paying.

Preamble and Resolutions.

Whereas, as citizens of a free country, assembled in our primary capacity, irrespective of party, and exercising our inalienable right of remonstrance against the oppression of excessive taxation, and the imposition upon us of grievous and unnecessary burdens, destroying our peace of mind, sapping the foundations of our prosperity, and depriving us of the advantages necessary to sustain the active competition of our sister cities and States; and further, staunchly disavowing for ourselves, and those who think with us, all those charges or suggestions which would attribute to us a desire to avoid, hinder, or delay the just, reasonable, or necessary operations of a representative government, by refusing or resisting the prompt payment of lawful taxes; and further, claiming to be acting the part of good citizens by resisting to the last the payment of such taxes as are equally unnecessary and unlawful, imposed without authority from us by persons whom we refuse to recognize as having the right to levy taxes, in that said parties were never elected by the people as representatives, and therefore by their affecting to levy taxes they violate the first principles of American liberty, baptized in blood in , and hallowed by the memories of ages, which teach us that taxation, to be legal, must be accompanied by representation, without which it is robbery, and should be resisted by good citizens under the motto of “millions for defense, but not a cent for tribute;” and further, noticing with no longer concealed indignation that the taxes paid in are not disbursed in the general interests, with economy, or a view to their diminution, but seem to be considered as a species of plunder to be managed in the interests of the distributors, as against the contributors; this being especially the case in the instances of the large sum annually wasted upon the military body known as the metropolitan police force, as well as the immense amounts thrown away upon persons, pretending to hold offices as park commissioners, police commissioners, levee commissioners, drainage commissioners, assessors, tax-collectors, inspectors, registrars, or permanent committee men, with numerous sinecurists, pluralists, and “handy men” generally — expensive, useless and dangerous vampires, corrupted and corrupting;

And whereas, further, we feel that we can no longer sustain the taxation which has taken the form of a speedy confiscation of our property, for the support of officials, contractors, and partisans; who under the alleged forms of law turn the results of public industry to their private emolument, and grow rich, insolent, and threatening, while the hard-working citizen grows poor and is admonished to be humble and good;

And further, that not only a pretended legislature, very many of whose members were the creatures of the most corrupt practices of ballot-box stuffing, quadrupled registration and voting by “repeaters,” and false counting of votes, have imposed upon us their conception of taxes, but they have passed the tax-levies and appropriation-bills through their body by notorious bribery, thus vitiating, as we believe, all powers they might have ever had to pass the tax-bills or make money-requisitions upon, or bargains binding the people, and earning for themselves the infamous notoriety of being, according to the language of the governor, who ought to know them, the most disgraceful legislature ever assembled in Louisiana;

And further, seeing that such a pretended legislature, on its own motion, and affecting to empower an appointed non-representative body calling itself the city administration, have together, through assessors who have an unlawful private interest in exaggerating and multiplying assessments, and who have done so beyond all reasonable or former bounds, sought to extort from an impoverished people an annual taxation upon these stimulated assessments of nearly five per cent., the exact figures being 2⅔ per cent., for the city and 21-⅟20 per cent. [sic] for the State;

And further, existing impositions, large as they are, do not form our only anxiety. They have for the past few years increased with such unexampled rapidity as to startle the most stolid and apathetic mind, and to rouse to positive resistance the most worthy and law abiding citizens, for it is well known that still greater burdens are being prepared for us. “Bad goes before, but worse remains behind.”

We are informed by James Graham, auditor, that the legislative appropriations for will demand an increase of eight mills on the dollar in addition to the enormous amount now wrung from the tax-payers of the State, being 2.05 per cent. net on an assessment of $250,000,000, reaching the incredible sum of nearly $6,000,000, gone for nothing, which additional percentage on a pretended assessment, which it is endeavored to raise to $300,000,000, will make next year’s confiscations amount on State account alone to over $7,000,000;

And whereas, further, our duty seems plain, whatever may be the final result of our movement, and if we decline, neglect, or refuse to do our duty, without fear or favor, as free citizens of a free country; if apathy, irresolution, a want of public spirit, or a selfish indifference to the misfortunes of others, should induce us to be laggards in this struggle for our homes and properties, then we shall have only ourselves to blame; but if, taking counsel from honor and courage, we nerve ourselves to the encounter, we unite our resistance under such forms and delays as laws yet afford us, until we can from an honest legislature and a representative municipality obtain some relief, then we shall have the proud satisfaction of knowing that “we, who would be free ourselves, have struck the blow:” Therefore, be it

  1. Resolved, That we who are here assembled, and as many others who shall hereafter associate themselves with us, form ourselves into an association whose object shall be to resist by legal means the present exorbitant, illegal, and unconstitutional taxes now attempted to be extorted from us as citizens of the State and city.
  2. Resolved, That the style of the association shall be “The People’s Association to Resist Unconstitutional Taxation.”
  3. Resolved, That the president of this mass meeting is requested to act as president of this association, and at his prudent convenience to summon to his aid counsel from the general membership, a vice-president from each district of the city, and a board of directors, consisting of one from each ward of the city, who together shall constitute the first board of directors, who shall be charged with the organization of the association in its necessary details, and the board may report progress through the press, or otherwise, as they may deem best for the interest of the members of the association.
  4. Resolved, That we pledge ourselves to give a cordial and prompt support to the association, to patronize its assemblies, and procure and encourage as many of our fellow-citizens as possible to join its membership.
  5. Resolved, That while we recognize cheerfully the right of every citizen to resist on his own account any illegal tax, we cannot see the force of the argument which would forbid us to combine together for the accomplishment of the same end.
  6. Resolved, That we cordially and earnestly invite the co-operation of every citizen, inasmuch as none are too high and none too low to feel the pressure of this practical confiscation. Every mechanic, merchant, drayman, banker, storekeeper, butcher, shoemaker, produce-dealer, commission-merchant, press-owner, insurance-agent, shipping-agent, property-owner, clerk, laborer, founderyman, carpenter, or whatever else, are all deeply interested in this movement for the legal resistance to unconstitutional taxation, and therefore will be warmly welcomed to the roll of the association whether they have already paid the whole or part of their taxes or not.
  7. Resolved, That in the mean time we will pay no more taxes to State or city, being supported in this view by the opinion of able counsel learned in law; but will, through our association, invoke the protection of the courts of the State and of the United States to test our right of resistance to exorbitant and confiscating taxation imposed by a pretended legislature, self-nominated, corruptly bought and sold by written contract, and sitting in defiance and contravention of the constitution of , which declares that a representative basis shall be established, and the representation distributed in accordance therewith, as well as our right to resist exorbitant taxation imposed by an appointed non-representative body of persons styling themselves the mayor and administrators of the city of New Orleans.
  8. Resolved, That when this meeting adjourns, it will be so to meet again at the call of the president of the association.

Non-Payment of Taxes

Rooms Democratic Parish Executive Committee of Orleans, .

This committee, composed of representatives of the democratic party of the city and parish of Orleans, although partisan in its character, is not insensible to the fact that parties exist but for the public good, and are only intended to promote the public welfare to which all partisanship should be subordinate. Influenced by these considerations, a committee was appointed from this body to take into consideration the subject of taxes, now become so excessive as to be really confiscation, as they exceed the revenue of property. This subcommittee reports to us in the following language, which we adopt as our own, and address to the public at large, so that all persona and parties may profit by our labors:

To pay taxes legally imposed by a legislature elected by the people is a duty which every good citizen owes, even though the taxes are somewhat onerous and excessive; but when the taxes are so cruelly excessive as to leave the citizen in the position of a mere tenant of the lands and buildings which may belong to him, and when the taxes are illegally imposed by so-called representatives of the people, who had been fraudulently foisted upon them for the avowed purpose of enriching an unprincipled executive and a corrupt ring of legislators and other public plunderers, the people should rise in their might and refuse to place money in the hands of the spoiler to complete their ruin and degradation.

Believing that this government is revolutionary, and as such has no legal claim upon the people for support; that the sham legislature was not elected by the people, but virtually appointed by the executive, and that no taxation can be lawful unless imposed by the legally-chosen representative of the tax-payer, we consulted eminent counsel upon this subject, the majority of whom confirmed our views, viz., that all taxes imposed by and under the revolutionary government are clearly illegal, and can be contested as such.

The members of the bar, so far as we have consulted them, were unanimous in opinion that the following city taxes were manifestly illegal: The school-tax, the park-tax, and the metropolitan-police tax. A number of gentlemen, whose names are subjoined [but omitted here], signed the following engagement. Such is the public spirit of the legal profession and the conviction of the illegality of the above taxes, that it is our opinion that almost every member of the bar would have attached his signature had he been approached by us for that purpose.

We spread these facts before the people, and earnestly counsel and advise them to unite and take every lawful means to resist the payment of all taxes.

I[saac] W. Patton, Chairman.
W. Woelper, Secretary.

Patton would become mayor of New Orleans after the United States dropped its support for the reconstruction government.

The statement, signed by several attorneys, read that they “engage themselves, without compensation, and as a matter of public service, to defend professionally all citizens, residents, or property-holders in this city, who shall desire their assistance in resisting the collection by municipal authorities of the taxes known as the ‘school-tax,’ the ‘park-tax,’ and the ‘metropolitan-police tax,’ and other taxes the collection of which may be lawfully resisted.”

Determined Meeting of Citizens — All Further Payments of State and City Taxes to be Resisted — Armed Organizations in Progress Throughout the City — The Voice of the People — Indignation and Enthusiasm

Pursuant to the call of two hundred and fifty citizens of the Second ward, for the meeting in favor of armed organization and to resist the further collection of taxes, a large body of determined men filled the hall of the Iron House, on Tchoupitoulas street, last evening, and there gave emphatic evidence that no longer would the people submit to the remorseless and unprincipled rule of a few adventurers, who by their acts thus compelled peaceful citizens to rise in their might, to protest, refuse, and, if need be, resist by force of arms, all further encroachments upon their rights.

The meeting was called to order at half past 7 o’clock, by Col. S.J.N. Smith, who moved that Mr. Archibald Mitchell be elected chairman pro tempore.

On taking the chair, Mr. Mitchell addressed those present in the following words:

Gentlemen: Before stating the purpose of this meeting, I will premise that we are not assembled here in the interest of any political party. Whatever may be our predilections as individuals, we are as an organized body neither democrats, reformers, nor republicans, but merely citizens endeavoring to secure our inherent and constitutional rights, and to preserve the remnant of property left to us by the tax-collector. We are not opposed to the present State government because it is nominally republican, but because it is organized and administered for no purpose whatever.

Our intention is to inaugurate a movement, which we hope will become general, having for its object the non-payment of all taxes until we have a government which legally represents the people and is administered to promote their material welfare. Our principal and primary object is to take measures to secure to all citizens, of all colors and conditions, the right of the elective franchise, by which all abuses may be corrected.

We justify our right to refuse to pay taxes on the following grounds:

They are greatly in excess of the legitimate expense of the government. They are in excess of the natural increase of property, and as such should be resisted, being actual confiscation. These taxes were not levied by the legally-elected representatives of the people, and they are not applied to promote the public interests. Besides, the whole State government is anti-republican and revolutionary, and as such has no legal claim on the citizens for support. In these views the ablest legal minds in this State concur.

The past history of this State leaves us in no doubt as to the course he will pursue in the coming election. Governor Warmoth has never failed in any instance to use force and fraud to accomplish his ends.

Therefore, having a positive moral assurance we will only be permitted to have the forms of an election, unless we forcibly maintain our rights, we propose to form ourselves into a military organization for that purpose, but we do not contemplate the employment of force, even in defense of our well-recognized rights, until all other means shall have failed.

Our object in meeting to-night is to discuss the expediency of the foregoing measures and the best mode of carrying them into effect.

Col. Eugene Waggaman, having been called upon to address the meeting, depicted in eloquent terms the present and the past history of this State. The alarming condition of political degradation under which the people are now and have been suffering for the past four years was described in all its corrupting and evil effects.

There was a necessity — a life and death necessity — of organizing a military association to meet force with force and protect what yet remained to the people of this degraded State. “Warmoth and his minions must be put down in their schemes of robbery and plunder. The means were in the hands of the people; stop the supplies; refuse to pay the taxes. There were other ways of defeating an army than by a conquering in battle. A general that cuts off the enemy’s supplies, and forces a surrender, is more to be honored than one who slaughters thousands.”

After the conclusion of Colonel Waggaman’s remarks, the following document was read and adopted, as expressing the views of those present:

To pay taxes legally imposed by a legislature elected by the people is a duty which every good citizen owes, even though the taxes are somewhat onerous and excessive: but when the taxes are so cruelly excessive as to leave the citizen in the position of a mere tenant of the lands and buildings which may belong to him, and when the taxes are illegally imposed by so-called representatives of the people, who have been fraudulently foisted upon them for the avowed purpose of enriching an unprincipled executive and a corrupt ring of legislators and other public plunderers, the people should rise in their might and refuse to place money in the hands of the spoiler, to complete their ruin and degradation.

In our present situation, with taxes so enormous, the payment of which will in a very, very few years bankrupt the citizens and force them either to revolution or exile, with an executive who openly boasts that his official patronage exceeds that of the President of the United States.

The document then inquired whether the people are willing to continue to pay taxes for the purpose of continuing the present corrupt rulers in power, “which has so long disgraced Louisiana and impoverished her people.”

It then goes on to state that the best legal talent of the State has been consulted relative to the constitutionality or the unconstitutionally of the present outrageous and obnoxious tax-laws, and “the almost unanimous opinion was that a great portion if not all of these laws are unconstitutional.”

The people were therefore advised no longer to pay the taxes to the State or city authorities until the question of the legality of the imposition is settled by the courts of the State and of the United States.

The members of the bar were then appealed to for the purpose of trying the cases where such taxes were brought in the conns free of charge.

The bar nobly responded to the appeal by from forty to fifty signatures of the leading lawyers of this city and State, and gave as their opinion (which was unanimous) that the school, metropolitan, and park taxes were unconstitutional, and could be successfully resisted before the courts. The majority also agreed in the opinion that many other taxes other than those mentioned above were also unconstitutional.

On motion, the sentiments and expressions embodied in the above were adopted as the objects of the meeting, and the thanks of those present tendered the legal gentlemen who had so generously offered their services to the people free of charge, to represent them in the courts as the protectors of their just rights.

The following resolutions were then read and adopted:

Some boring organizational ones, and then:

Resolved, That a committee of five be appointed to draw up a plan by which the citizens may co-operate, to employ counsel and mutually assist each other in their refusal to pay taxes.

“Archibald Mitchell was then elected permanent president, and Hugh McClosky vicepresident of the association by acclamation. ¶ The latter gentleman accepted the honor conferred upon him, although he was not a resident of the ward. Mr. McClosky said that if he had to resist the further payment of taxes singly and alone, he had determined upon doing so. [Cheers.]”

There is also some testimony given in the same volume about terrorists from the White League, or perhaps some allied groups, intimidating tax collectors into resigning their posts, or interfering with tax auctions. In one case:

There was a mob of fifty or sixty armed men came to prevent the deputy tax-collector effecting a sale, armed with revolvers nearly all. Mr. Fournet came and threatened the deputy and tax-collector. The deputy and tax-collector ran into their offices. I came down and called upon the citizens to clear the court-house, but could not succeed. I then called upon the military, but they had no orders at that time to give me assistance to carry out the law.

Another person said, of (I think) the same incident:

…Mr. [Valsin A.?] Fournet came with eight or ten. When the deputy tax-collector attempted to make a sale Mr. Fournet raised his hand and struck him. The deputy then shoved him down. As soon as this was done forty, fifty, or sixty men came with their revolvers in hand.

…very few people attended tax-sales [typically], because the white people were organized to prevent tax-collection, and pledged themselves not to buy any property at tax-sales, and the property was generally bought by the State.

The government reprisals against tax resisters included the following, according to one account:

Every delinquent tax-payer, however small the amount, was compelled to pay $2 auditor’s fee, $1.50 advertising fee, $1.50 recorder’s fee, and $5 surveyor’s fee, for useless paper survey, and 25 cents for notice; all of which went into the pockets of officials, and in no respect increased the revenue of the State. In addition to this, the legislature organized under Governor Kellogg passed a law rendering any delinquent incompetent as a witness in any civil suit, and preventing him from bringing any suit. No injunction, it is believed, could be taken against the action of the tax-collector, however much he might deviate from law.

Some of that was later ruled to be unconstitutional.

Tax resistance was only one part of a campaign that included terrorism, the establishment of parallel government structures, and a variety of other techniques. It was eventually successful at ending Union control of the heart of formerly Confederate territory, and allowing the white supremacists to return to power, though never as the independent nation they’d aimed at.


Rallies outside the courthouse or prison are one way of supporting resisters who are looking at doing time for taking their stand (see The Picket Line for ), and supporting their families while they’re being held captive is another (see The Picket Line for ).

Other ways to show support are to accompany resisters as they go to prison, to visit them or correspond with them while they are inside, and to be there to meet them when they are released. Today I’ll give some examples of these ways of showing support for imprisoned tax resisters.

Accompanying resisters to prison

  • When elderly council tax rebel Sylvia Hardy was threatened with jail in , her supporters organized a convoy of cars to accompany her to the jail as a show of support.
  • In , Annuity Tax resisters in Edinburgh, Scotland, would go to prison in a parade of protesters. One description of such a procession read:

    [H]e was marched off to the Calton Jail, accompanied by the usual hasty muster of people carrying flags and poles, having placards on which were a variety of devices and inscriptions… His daughter, a fine young woman, in a fit of heroic indignation which overmastered her grief and the natural timidity of her sex, seized one of the flags, and would have walked before her father to prison with the crowd, but was prevented by him and the interference of the humane bystanders.

  • When Kate Harvey went to prison for her resistance as part of the Women’s Tax Resistance League, fellow-resisters Charlotte Despard and Mary Anderson accompanied her to the prison gates. When Elizabeth Knight was imprisoned on similar charges, she was accompanied to Holloway by resisters Florence Underwood and Isabel Tippett.

Visiting resisters in prison

  • Thomas Story, an English Quaker who was visiting the American colonies, was able to help two Quakers from Rhode Island who were in prison for not paying a militia exemption tax after having been drafted and refusing to fight. Story helped them hold a Quaker meeting in the prison itself, and also (having some legal experience) tried to assist them in court.
  • When Zerah Colburn Whipple was imprisoned for failing to pay a war tax in , it was a comfort to him to have friends on the outside trying to get in. He wrote: “Our friend John J. Copp, proved himself a true friend indeed. Knowing that I would be lonely in the jail, he visited me every day after he learned that I was there, and when the keeper refused him admission, he demanded it as his right to visit his client, and claimed the right to see me alone too, which was granted.”
  • The Trafalgar Square Defendants’ Campaign helped to organize prison visits to people who had been imprisoned in the Poll Tax rebellion.

Corresponding with imprisoned resisters

I’ve done a lot of volunteer work with the Prison Literature Project in Berkeley, California. Most of the letters we get are from prisoners requesting books — which makes sense, because that’s the sort of letter we explicitly ask for. But a pretty hefty percentage of the letters we get are just expressing gratitude for the books and letters we previously sent — heartfelt, often heartbreaking gratitude, especially since many of the prisoners are of limited means and can barely afford to put a stamp on a letter.

This impresses on me how meaningful it is for people behind bars to get letters from friends outside.

  • The Anarchist Black Cross of New York City held a letter-writing evening for imprisoned war tax resister Carlos Steward in .
  • Brian Wright was the first person thrown in prison for Poll Tax resistance, during the rebellion in the United Kingdom, in . While there he received over 800 cards and letters from supporters. The Trafalgar Square Defendants’ Campaign made it a policy to ensure that at least one personal letter per prisoner per week came from someone in the campaign.
  • When Kate Harvey had barricaded herself in her own home to try to defeat government attempts to seize her property for taxes, a supporter sent her a poem to keep her mood up:

    Good luck, my friend, I wish to thee,
    In thy brave fight ’gainst tyranny.
    Bracken Hill Siege will bring good cheer
    To those who hold our Freedom dear,
    And fight the good fight far and near.

    And when oppression is out-done,
    And Liberty, at last, is won,
    When women civic rights possess,
    They’ll think, I hope, with thankfulness,
    Of those who bore the battle’s stress.

  • When a Colorado doctor was jailed for refusing to pay federal income taxes that fund weapons of mass destruction, it was reported that “[l]etters of approval have been pouring in to Dr. Evans, and since he is only allowed to write very few, his mother in Philadelphia has taken up the task of acknowledging them, sending at the same time a typewritten sheet explaining the affair in detail.”

Welcoming resisters back from prison

  • The campaign to resist Thatcher’s Poll Tax organized a march to Brixton Prison, which held most of the resisters then in custody. Police attacked the march and arrested 135 people. “That evening,” says campaign volunteer Danny Burns, “volunteers were sent to every police station to welcome those who were released on bail.” This served not only to show solidarity, but also to make the arrested people aware of the legal support available to them and to encourage them to cooperate in their defense.
  • When Constance Andrews of the Women’s Tax Resistance League was released after having been jailed for a week for failure to pay a dog license tax, “a very large crowd — described in the local press as ‘an immense gathering’ — collected outside the prison to cheer Miss Andrews on her release.” A procession with suffrage banners walked along with Andrews as she walked from the prison to a reception held in her honor.
  • When Mark Wilks was released from prison for failure to pay his wife’s income tax in , the Women’s Tax Resistance League held a reception for the Wilkses, saying that “not only do they wish to do honour to those who have made such a brave stand for tax resistance, but to use the occasion, as one of many others, to keep before the public mind the necessity for the alteration of the laws.”
  • Katsuki James Otsuka served a 120-day sentence for refusing to pay war taxes to the U.S. government (and then refusing to pay the fine he was given for his initial refusal) in . A group of supporters demonstrated outside the prison at the time of his anticipated release, though “four carloads of state police” broke up the demonstration at one point, smashing a picket sign that read “You did right in refusing to pay taxes for A-bombs.”
  • During the white supremacist rebellion against the Reconstruction state government in Louisiana a man named Edward Booth was imprisoned for 24 hours for refusing to pay a license tax.

    [I]t was agreed among his immediate personal friends, the members of the tax resisting association and their sympathizers, to make a grand demonstration, at the hour of his release, and escort him to his place of business, to show their sympathies, and in what approbation he was held for having become the object of an oppression, in the defence of his personal rights.

    Before the hour of his release, a large concourse of people assembled before the doors of the prison, to hail the deliverance of the prisoner, and the anteroom was thronged with friends anxious to proffer the hand of sympathy and condolence. … Mr. Booth filed out of the room and stepped into a carriage in waiting, amid rousing cheers and a stirring air from the band. The carriage led off, followed by the band and the large concourse of people, who gradually fell into an orderly line of twos, to the number of about 400.

    The marchers hung an effigy of the Reconstruction governor from a lamp post while loudly cheering. When the procession reached Booth’s place of business, he gave a speech thanking the crowd for their support and urging them to renew their resistance.
  • William Tait, editor of Tait’s Edinburgh Magazine, was imprisoned for refusing to pay the Annuity Tax in that city, which went to support the official church, of which Tait was not a member. After four days, he was released. The Scotsman covered the story:

    [Tait] stepped into the open carriage, drawn by four horses, which stood on the street… At this moment, one of the gentlemen in the carriage, waving his hat, proposed three cheers for the King, and three cheers for Mr. Tait, — both of which propositions were most enthusiastically carried into effect. The procession was then about to move off, when, much against the will of Mr. Tait and the Committee, the crowd took the horses from the carriage, and with ropes drew it along the route of procession… As the procession marched along, it was joined by several other trades, who had been late in getting ready; and seldom have we seen such a dense mass of individuals as Prince’s Street presented on this occasion. In the procession alone, there were not fewer than 8,000 individuals; and we are sure that the spectators were more than thrice as numerous. Mr. Tait was frequently cheered as he passed along, — and never, but on the occasion of the Reform Bill, was a more unanimous feeling witnessed than on that which brought the people together yesterday afternoon.


Here are a few more data points from the tax resistance campaign by insurgent white supremacists, led by the shadow government of John McEnery, against the carpetbagger government of William Pitt Kellogg in post-Civil War Louisiana in .

From The Ouachita Telegraph, :

Kellogg’s Desperate Threats

The New York World advises our people in the following words:

This is the first instance in the history of our thirty-seven State Governments in which a governor has been constrained by his fears and necessities, to issue a menacing proclamation requiring the payment of taxes. It betokens an already empty treasury and no means to fill it. Kellogg has been but little more than two months in his bogus governorship, and in spite of the ready advance of their taxes by his few adherents he is constrained by his distresses and apprehensions to flourish and crack his lash over the shoulders of the tax-payers. By fulminating this unexampled proclamation he advertises his weakness and fears. He can borrow no money, for his government is so notoriously illegal that no lender would expect payment. If he should undertake to sell property for taxes, there would be no buyers, because an illegal Government could not give a valid title. Hence he is reduced to the necessity of resorting to bluster and threats. Having already got all he can collect from the few property holders among his own partisans, he tries to intimidate the weak-minded of his opponents, and scare them into furnishing the money without which his usurpation must soon collapse and perish. His proclamation is like a signal gun at sea fired by a pirate ship that is about to be on gulfed in the waves.

The advantages of the people of Louisiana for escaping the payment of taxes to support this usurpation are great and manifest. Its opponents comprise five sixths of the property holders of the State. They alone possess the means of buying property offered to be sold for taxes, and their hostility to Kellogg and his crew will prevent them from ever bidding a dollar on such property. No man will bid on that of his neighbor, and he feels assured that in return no neighbor will bid on his. As for buyers out of the State, they would be repelled by the inability of the Kellogg Government to give a legal title, and by the indignant hostility of every neighborhood against such mercenary interloping. If the State governments could support themselves, like the Federal Government, by indirect taxation, this form of resistance would not be easy. When duties are laid on imported goods, or an excise on whisky and tobacco, every purchaser pays the tax, and the people can protect themselves only by refusing to consume the taxed articles, as our patriot forefathers did in the Revolution. But happily this mode of taxation does not prevail in our State Governments. State taxes are direct; they are laid on property, not on consumption; they are paid immediately into the hands of the collector, not mixed up with the prices of commodities. There is no other penalty for non-payment than the distraint and sale of property, and property cannot be sold when there are no buyers. Kellogg’s supporters are chiefly the negroes who pay no taxes themselves, and are too poor to purchase the property of their white neighbors even if they could get the fee simple and a good title by paying one year’s taxes.

It is obvious that the Kellogg Government must come to an early end if the united property-holders of Louisiana passively withhold the supplies, and keep scornfully away from all auction sales advertised by Kellogg’s collectors.

Resistance to Taxation by the Kellogg Government.

Letter of Gov. M’Enery.

State of Louisiana, Executive Office,
New Orleans,

 I respectfully suggest that, with as little delay as possible, there be called in your parish a mass meeting of citizens to perfect a complete and thorough organization, with a view to resistance of collection of taxes by the Kellogg Government.

I will remain at my post at the Capitol and exercise, so far as practicable, the powers and functions of my office, and I appeal to the people of the State to rally to my support, and give me effective aid in my efforts to uphold their rights and liberties.

It is impossible that the Kellogg usurpation can continue beyond the meeting of Congress in , and if our liberties are worth anything at all they are worth a struggle against tyranny rand usurpation from now until Congress shall definitely act in our case.

Let there be unanimity among the tax-payers of Louistana, and the foul usurpation now headed by Wm. Pitt Kellogg will be blasted, and in due time Louisiana will be blest with the government of her choice.

John McEnery,
Governor of Louisiana.

Sustaining the Kellogg Fraud.

From the Union Record we have the following manly counsel:

While there is no earthly means by which we can, at the present, get rid of the Kellogg usurpation, we can refuse to give it any support. We can refuse to contribute anything toward it in the way of taxes. It cannot live without bur money — indeed it lives for our money. Withhold that from it, and it will soon come to grief. We notice that the movements of the tax resistance association in New Orleans has already alarmed the chief conspirator. He gives vent to his uneasiness through what is called a proclamation warning the people against refusing to pay taxes. We are not surprised at this. How natural it is for the wolf when he sees his prey slipping from his paw, to give vent to his disappointed feelings by a savage howl! So it is with Kellogg, the slightest prospect of loosing his prey, brings from his ravenous lips a threatening howl. Let our people take no notice of his threats, but, in every parish in the State, meet in counsel; form into associations, act in concert — as one man, and resolve not to pay one cent of tribute to the vile usurpers. If we are united we can accomplish good. We cannot individually. Unless the people will come together, and agree to act In concert, there will be no alternative but to meet the demands of the Kellogg tax collectors, and let the government of our choice dissolve into nothingness. Which we cannot afford to do, if, for no other reason, because all hope of having our rights secured by Congress is not entirely gone. It is true Congress adjourned leaving us in the hands of Grant, but it did not recognize the Kellogg government. Since the adjournment of Congress, the Senate has been in extra session and it still refuses to recognize either the Kellogg or Fusion government, by not admitting either Pinchback or McMillen to a seat in the Senate, but have expressly deferred the matter till the regular session in . Now if we permit the Fusion government to dissolve, and give in our voluntary adhesion to the Kellogg usurpation how can we hope to be heard in Congress at its regular session? So every consideration of self-respect, manhood, patriotism and interest demand that we give no support to the Kollogg usurpation, only as enforced at the point of the bayonet!

The U.S. Senate never did decide which of the rival Louisiana Senators (William McMillen or P.B.S. Pinchback) ought to take Governor Kellogg’s vacant seat and join them. Kellogg’s governorship lasted until , by which time the white supremacist Democrats, who had switched from tax resistance to terrorism, succeeded in regaining political control in the state.

The next piece comes from The Morning Star and Catholic Messenger, . Oddly, it does not mention the Kellogg/McEnery feud, but comes around to recommending tax resistance on the grounds that the present tax system is unconstitutional in the way that it uses “license” fees to enact what is essentially a poll tax on businesses, whereas the constitution says that any such taxation should be proportional to business income:

The above very brief statement of the violations of constitutional principles in the manner of levying taxes in this State, suffices we think, to show that the tax-resisters are justifiable. We consider it to be the right and duty of all good citizens, to refuse to pay an unjust, oppressive, exhorbitant, or unconstitutional tax, or system of taxation. This is their duty to themselves, to their country, and to republican institutions.

But, it may be said that all resistance is vain, that the resisters will be ultimately overcome, to their great loss, etc. Considering the utter disregard of right and conscience the powers that be have exhibited, the chances are in favor of those who predict that they will do evil. Still, we insist that resistance to wrong will ultimately produce good results. The mere fact of resistance will do good. The obstacles opposed to wrong, the difficulties it will be compelled to contend with, will diminish its confidence in itself, and make it hesitate or restrict itself to narrower limits. If its way is made easy it would be encouraged it and perhaps hereafter do worse. Then, the credit of the wrong-doer will be impaired, his resources diminished, and his ability to do harm be greatly crippled.

True, we have little to hope from the Legislature and Supreme Court of the State. True, though our State Constitution bristles with articles and clauses guaranteeing equal rights, the Supreme Court will refuse to enforce these in favor of the tax-paying portion of the people. Nevertheless, there is a gleam of hope from another quarter. There is a higher break in the clouds of oppression that have hung over our political skies. In their ardent zeal to emancipate and elevate the black man, the Northern States have added brand new articles to the Federal Constitution; and it turns out that these very articles may be turned against the wrongs, our Barbarian State Government would fain inflict on the white man. These new articles impose principles of equality upon the State Governments, and thereby insure the right of appeal from the Supreme Court of the State to the Supreme Court of the United States, in all eases in which this equality is infringed. The famous fourteenth amendment particularly has this effect. It says: “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law, nor deny to any person within in its jurisdiction the equal protection of its laws.” Of course this applies when the State law itself denies this equal protection or infringes the principles of justice and equality universally recognised in civilized countries. If the State were to impose its taxes on negroes only, or at a higher rate than on white men, who can doubt that the Supreme Court of the United States would decide such inequality to be a violation of the fourteenth amendment. If this is clear then it is also clear they must decide that laws which tax a tailor and exempt a milliner — tax butchers and exempt bakers — tax merchant-tailors more than lawyers, notaries more than retail merchants, and retail merchants more than butchers or bakers and so forth, are, on the same principle, contrary to this article of the Constitution of the United States. Let the tax resisters therefore, never surrender, till they awake the whole people, the poor as well as the rich, in the future as well as to day, to a consciousness of the danger and injustice of such precedents and of such arbitrary modes of taxation. Public sentiment will have its effect in shaming the judiciary, and causing them to retract their sanction of such iniquities and absurdities. Besides, it is not unreasonable to expect that the Supreme Court of the United States will enforce the fourteenth Amendment according to its true spirit and meaning, and then we will be disenthralled.

From The Ouachita Telegraph, :

Payment of Taxes.

We invite attention to the proceedings of the meeting held on . The next meeting will be held on for the purpose of organizing the tax-resisters permanently. Meanwhile, provisional officers have been announced who will hasten on the work of organization. The people may rely upon it, that in Ouachita, and in every other parish in the State, there will be organizations to resist the payment of taxes to Kellogg. Ways and means will not be wanting to block the game of that model ruler.

The Shreveport Bar.

It is a pleasure to us to point our brethren of the legal fraternity all over the State to the action taken by nearly all the prominent members of the Shreveport Bar, respecting litigation in the courts over the payment of taxes to the Kellogg government. It will be seen by reference to the proceedings published on our first page, that a number of the leading lawyers of Shreveport are pledged to attend gratuitously to the defense in all tax suits brought by the Kellogg officials of Caddo parish. It will also be seen that a lawyer can, if he will, make himself, as well as any other citizen van, a party in opposition to political frauds, accomplished though they be, and can array himself in an attitude of professional hostility to an usurping power.

We commend, most warmly, the decided action of the Shreveport lawyers to the lawyers of Monroe who were actively engaged in the support of the Fusion cause, and especially to those who wanted to condemn every one who would not rush frantically to the support of Horace Greeley and of a combination in this State of all the political elements opposed to Grant and Radicalism. They led the advance then, and we now call upon them as leaders to stand like men in their chosen positions.

Tax-Payers’ Meeting

At a meeting of the tax-payers of Ouachita parish to take into consideration and to perfect an organization for the resistance of the payment of taxes to the illegal and usurping government known as the Kellogg government, it was moved and seconded that D. Faulk take the chair and D.C. Brown act as Secretary.

The meeting being called to order, it was moved, seconded, and carried that the Chair appoint a committee of five to draft resolutions to perfect said organization; whereupon the Chair appointed the following committee: Col. R. Richardson, Smith W. Bennett, Capt. G.W. McCranie, Fred Cann, and A.A. Lacy.

The committee submitted the following report, which was unanimously adopted:

, .

Your committee, appointed to consider and report a plan for resisting on the part of the people of the Parish of Ouachita the payment of taxes to the Kellogg government, respectfully report that they have had the subject under consideration, and beg leave to report—

That your committee is not in doubt of the illegality, from the beginning, of the said Kellogg government, and that, whenever its claims to our support are legally tested, opposition thereto will be affirmed as right and just. Our duty as citizens and individuals, therefore, demand of us the use of all legal and constitutional means to defeat the great outrage by which the people of Ouachita and the State have been defrauded of their rights; and your committee, believe that one of the rights left to them, and necessary to be exercised to show that the people are not untrue to themselves, their ancestry, or the cause of self-government, is the resistance of payment of taxes to the usurping government established by the affidavits of W.P. Kellogg and the illegal orders of Judge Durell. For the purpose of making more effectual this recommendation, your committee have considered it wise and just to suggest the organization of a Tax-resisting Association, composed of all the tax-payers of the parish opposed to the payment of taxes to the Kellogg government, which association shall organize permanently to resist the payment of such taxes, with such officers as will carry on the object contemplated by this meeting. It is further recommended that a public meeting for the purpose of organizing the Association, permanently, be held on , and that, meanwhile, the chairman of this meeting appoint provisional officers, consisting of a President, three Vice Presidents, a Treasurer and Secretary, who shall proceed to take charge of and prosecute diligently the duties of such offices for the purpose of organizing the people into an association to resist the payment of taxes to the Kellogg government, and to this end shall notify the people of the parish to hold primary meetings expressive of their views and to appoint delegates to the parish meeting and of the day selected for the public meeting above recommended, and shall make such collections of funds as may be deemed necessary to defray the expenses of a permanent organization. It is further recommended that the Provisional President caused to be prepared and circulated throughout the parish, for signatures, an agreement to be signed by all such tax-payers as will join and adhere to the contemplated Tax-resisting Association and will bear their share of the burthen in the effort to restore to Louisiana a government chosen by her own people.

Very respectfully submitted,
R. Richardson, Chairman.

The chairman appointed the following officers: Col. R. Richardson, Provisional President; S.D. McEnery, Eli Noble, Robert J. Wilson, Vice Presidents; G.W. McFee, Treasurer and Secretary.

On motion, the meeting adjourned.

D. Faulk, President.
D.C. Brown, Secretary.

And, from The Daily Phoenix of Colombia, South Carolina, of :

The Release of Mr. Edward Booth.

In the Superior District Court, on , in the case of the State vs. Edward Booth, now pending, to compel defendant to pay his license tax, the court adjudged that Mr. Booth had violated an order of the court, for which Judge Hawkins sentenced him to be confined in the parish prison for twenty-four hours and to pay a fine of twenty dollars.

From the present attitude of many of the citizens of our city to the State Government, the case naturally excited the profoundest interest, and the decree of the court in fining Mr. Booth and sending him to prison, naturally created a widespread sympathy. According to instructions, Mr. Booth was imprisoned on , for twenty-four hours.

On it was agreed among his immediate personal friends, the members of the tax resisting association, and their sympathizers, to make a grand demonstration, at the hour of his release, and escort him to his place of business, to show their sympathies, and in what approbation he was held for having become the object of an oppression, in the defence of his personal rights.

Before the hour of his release, a large concourse of people assembled before the doors of the prison, to hail the deliverance of the prisoner, and the anteroom was thronged with friends anxious to proffer the hand of sympathy and condolence. Presently, at , Captain Freneaux approached Mr. Booth and told him that he was free. Taking the arm of Mr. E.J. Ellis, Mr. Booth filed out of the room and stepped into a carriage in waiting, amid rousing cheers and a stirring air from the band. The carriage led off, followed by the band and the large concourse of people, who gradually fell into an orderly line of twos, to the number of about 400.

On the way, the marching assembly gave repeated and loud cheers, which were vociferous on beholding an effigy at the corner of Camp and Gravier streets, hung to a telegraph pole. All exclaimed, “That’s Kellogg! That’s Kellogg!” and the cheers were renewed. From thence the effigy was taken to the corner of Magazine and Gravier, and again strung up, this time to a lamp-post. Here a large crowd gathered, when some one applied a match to the effigy, and it was in a short time entirely destroyed.

The carriage containing Mr. Booth drove to the door of his place of business, and, on alighting from the vehicle, the crowd called loudly upon him for an address, to which he gave heed by mounting a box and motioning for silence. He thanked the assembly for the grand demonstration which they had made on the event of his release, but regarded the fervor rather to the merits of the principles which were involved, than a feeling appertaining to his case individually. He denounced the steps taken against him as a move showing that the most sacred rights of the people were jeopardized, and that the present administration was arrayed against the liberty of the people; that they had been outraged, and that it now devolved upon them to resist, by every legitimate means, the advances of this oppression. He cited to them the fact that their cause was now before the congress of the people — the nation itself — and not that body termed a Congress which assemble at Washington. The people of this country would eventually cry against the wrongs now being perpetrated, and they would be adjusted. He exhorted them to remember that “eternal vigilance is the price of liberty,” and that to lie supinely dormant was to see every vestige of a freeman’s boon swept from them. Mr. Booth closed his remarks by saying: “This is a State where men know their own rights, and, knowing them, dare defend them.”

Colonel Smith took the stand, and, in the name of Mr. Booth, requested that the crowd now retire, at the same time urging them to be prepared and nerved to their work, and if occasion demand, let the halter be applied to him who would be the despoiler of a people’s liberty. — New Orleans Times.