Tax resistance in the “Peace Churches” → Brethren → Deanna Brown

This is the twenty-seventh in a series of posts about war tax resistance as it was reported in back issues of Gospel Herald, journal of the (Old) Mennonite Church.

“Gospel Herald” logo, circa 1986

From the issue:

H.B. Kossen, arms crossed, standing, amid a circle of people indoors
Dutch Mennonite stages arms protest in his living room.

Dutch Mennonite theologian H.B. Kossen (standing, left) had a golden opportunity to explain his views on nuclear weapons to the media recently when a bailiff came to collect taxes he had withheld in protest against the placing of American cruise missiles in Europe. The bailiff collected the money by holding an auction at the Kossen apartment in Amsterdam.

Kossen and his supporters, including politicians and church leaders, used the event to hold a press conference and communion service. Over 70 of the supporters announced they would also begin withholding a symbolic portion of their taxes.

Kossen, who was one of the main speakers at the Mennonite World Conference assembly in Wichita, Kans., teaches at the University of Amsterdam and at the Mennonite seminary on the same campus.

His protest is part of a growing peace movement among Mennonites and others in the Netherlands. It is estimated that one fifth of all the Dutch people have participated in street demonstrations against the cruise missiles.

The Mennonite Central Committee held its annual meeting , and rejected a corporate war tax resistance action:

There was also lively and extended discussion about a report from the Tax Withholding Task Force. This group had talked to representatives of MCC’s supporting denominations about whether MCC should honor the requests of four employees that it no longer continue to forward to the government the military portion of their withheld federal income taxes.

Phil Rich, who chaired the task force, reported that while there was much soul searching and serious attention given to the request, none of the denominations were ready to counsel MCC to honor the request for institutional involvement in illegal non-withholding.

Four board members [out of 37] voted to support the request of the four staff persons. “Our history tells us that actions of minority people like this” lead us to greater faithfulness, said Larry Kehler.

But the majority voted with Vice-Chairman Ross Nigh, who said, “We are bound by the process we have begun. We went to the conferences who own MCC and without exception they recommended that MCC not honor the request of staff.”

The (U.S.) Peace Section tried to soften the blow ():

MCC U.S. Peace Section offers help to people opposed to war taxes

Once again it is tax filing time. For those who object to their tax dollars being used to fund the military, this is an agonizing time.

To help such people, Mennonite Central Committee U.S. Peace Section has just completed an information packet on military tax opposition, and designated an alternative fund for those wishing to channel a portion of their tax dollars to a peaceful purpose.

The free information packet includes descriptions of varying theological positions on the war-tax issue, the federal budget allocation of funds, a discussion of options available for war-tax opposition, and information on Internal Revenue Service action as a result of tax resistance.

The alternative fund will channel tax dollars to victims of political violence in Guatemala. Human-rights abuses are again increasing in that Central American country.

To obtain the information packet and more details on the alternative fund, interested people should contact MCC U.S. Peace Section…

Titus Peachey offered this proposal in the issue:

A modest proposal on money

A modest proposal: Let the Christians of the world resolve to give more of their wealth to God than to Caesar’s armies.

For those who consider tax resistance incompatible with their interpretation of Scripture, we would suggest a strict observance of the biblical injunction to tithe. Every year Christians, like other citizens, pay their federal taxes. For most people, these taxes are deducted from their paychecks automatically, so that the cash flow into the government coffers is regular and abundant. While some may be disquieted by the fact that 57 percent of their taxes goes to the military, most will remember the verse “Render unto Caesar…” and make sure Caesar is paid.

Why is it, then, that the Mennonite Church cannot “Render unto God…” with equal ease? The Bible, in fact, goes into considerable detail about how to give our money to God, even giving us the standard of a 10 percent tithe. Yet we are inexcusably lax in practicing this biblical injunction.

By recent estimates at the Ames (Iowa) Assembly of the Mennonite Church, Mennonites contributed between 5 and 6 percent of their incomes to the church. Can we rightfully claim that we pay our federal taxes because the Bible tells us to, while failing to pay our tithe? Surely if being biblical were our honest intention, we would make absolutely certain that God’s tax (the tithe) was paid in full. What is God to think of us?

According to the Center for Defense Information, an average U.S. family of four, earning $25,000 a year, would normally pay $2,064 — or 8 percent of their income to the military. Thus it appears likely that Mennonites pay more to Caesar’s armies than to the church.

We think it is time to correct this situation. Each congregation should appoint a tax collector whose duty it must be to collect 10 percent of each member’s income every month. Provision should also be made to collect back tithes and accumulated interest fees from the date of membership to the present. Those who find it hard to pay could simply borrow from their federal tax payments.

Certainly God must be honored with our tithes. If that means Internal Revenue Service received only 50 to 60 percent of what is owed, perhaps we could discuss the problem sometime during a Mennonite Church assembly.

In an op-ed, D. Michael Hostetler asked, “Why aren’t we talking about implications of paying taxes we know support activities inconsistent with what Jesus taught?” (Weren’t we?)

The Mennonite Central Committee’s executive committee met in and decided to deal with the issue that wouldn’t go away in the time-honored bureaucratic fashion of forming a subcommittee to study the issue:

On another matter, the committee struggled with the issues posed by MCC employees whose request not to have income taxes withheld was rejected after long debate at the MCC annual meeting in . It was decided at that time that, despite this decision, MCC should continue to affirm the integrity of those objecting to war taxes and establish a committee that would study and create broader awareness of the impact of militarism on refugees, hunger, and development.

But the mandate of that group, which is to begin meeting in , was not clearly defined. Executive Committee chairman Elmer Neufeld said there seems to be a “strong expectation” from some that the special committee will continue to work specifically on the taxwithholding issue.

Several people are standing on a sidewalk near mailboxes. One holds a sign reading “truth + justice + freedom + love = peace”.

Tax resisters give money to needy causes.

Ten Mennonites, Catholics, and Brethren gathered in front of the courthouse in Kalamazoo, Mich., on to voice their opposition to military spending. Instead of paying the Internal Revenue Service the portion of their income taxes they claimed would go into the U.S. defense budget, they chose instead to give their combined withholdings totaling $1,600 to five local social-service agencies.

Accompanied by guitar, the protesters sang “Peace” and “Down by the Riverside." They then made personal statements and mailed their tax returns. Winfred Stoltzfus (back to camera) declared that the taking of life violated his religious beliefs and his medical training. “As medical students we are taught to save life,” he said. “I cannot in good conscience continue to voluntarily support and pay the federal taxes budgeted for war and death.”

Ellen Kinsenger-Roihi of Center City Housing (third from right) and Marcia Jackson of Loaves and Fishes (extreme right) were present to receive checks for their agencies. Three other checks were mailed during the demonstration to Habitat for Humanity, Kalamazoo Diaeonal Conference, and Kalamazoo Youth Ministry.

Flanking the banner are four of the tax resisters (left to right): Deanna Brown, Terry Ciszek, Joanne Lehman, and Andrew Lehman.

a standing Chicago Police officer grabs one arm of a man lying on his back while with the man’s other hand he offers the officer a flower.

Chicagoans protest “contra” aid with “die-in.”

Eight Chicago area Mennonites participated in a “die-in" and street witness at the post office in Chicago on to demonstrate their opposition to President Ronald Reagan’s request for $100 million in U.S. aid to the “contra” rebels in Nicaragua. Here a protester hands a flower to a police officer before being forcibly removed!

Kris Chupp and Dorothy Friesen joined 25 others who entered the post office and dropped to the ground one by one to dramatize the reality faced by Nicaraguans daily as a result of contra raids on that country. Orlando Redekop placed flowers on the “dead” and told the people mailing their tax forms the day before the deadline that their taxes are used to kill Nicaraguans.

Other Mennonites joined the 300 demonstrators outside the post office who put up posters depicting a bloody hand on a tax form.

No arrests were made. The “dead” were dragged from the building and heaped outside the door. “I was heartened,” said Friesen, “that the officer accepted the flower I gave him in the name of the dead women and children of Nicaragua.”

The Mennonite participants are part of the National Pledge of Resistance movement, whose members have committed themselves to resist U.S. military escalation in Central America.

Max E. Thierry gave some thought to the war tax resistance question in the issue:

The income tax and God’s call to obedience

My first contact with the income tax issue was at Bethlehem , where a part of the Mennonite Church decided it wasn’t going to collect taxes for the government. I admired that position. In I began to study economics, and it led to the income tax. I have been studying the income tax issue for a year now and have quit paying income tax or filing tax forms on moral and legal bases.

Mennonites are famous for nonresistance. I have come to believe that it’s easy to say we’re nonresistant and we want peace throughout the world and at home. Then we turn around and pay for the very acts we as Christians feel are wrong. As Christians we say war is wrong, killing is wrong, and that Christ told us to love our enemies. Is it love when we pay to have our enemies bombed and killed? Is it love to kill unwanted babies and pay for it with money that we earn by the fruits of our labor?

I suggest if we pay for it we are just as guilty of the crimes against humanity as are the ones who actually do it. If a person pays another person to kill someone he can be charged with murder and sent to jail under our legal system. I believe God has a much higher standard for his people.

I can no longer pay for murder and justify it by Romans 13 because God has instituted government. I will obey government if its laws are in harmony with God’s laws. I will also obey government only if it follows the law that was laid out for this country in the constitution.

What sets a Christian apart from the world anyway? We don’t act because we might lose our money and power. It’s purely selfish reasons that we give for going along. Christ died on the cross for not going along. Disciples were put in jail for not going along. What is a Christian? One who says he loves his neighbor and pays to have his enemies killed? I believe not.

The Internal Revenue Service has threatened to prosecute me and has fined me $500 as a civil penalty (I have refused to pay it). They have tried to audit me (I will not submit to their assumed authority) and they have threatened to seize any property I own and levy my wages in payment of alleged taxes. They will eventually do one or all of the above. Four years ago I had a “net worth” of $20,000. Today it is around $1,000 as I have sold off most all that I had. I will never be able to personally “own” a car or house since the IRS would take it.

I will lose my $25,000-a-year job as a direct result of my actions. I will most likely end up in a federal prison for my beliefs in God and country.

The most-asked question is “Why?” My answer is, “Because it’s the right thing to do.” Christ calls us to obedience and while I do not by any means say that I am not prone to sin, I try to follow God’s calling in my life. By the shedding of Christ’s blood on the cross he paid for all our sins, but that doesn’t give us the right to ignore our sin for personal gain.

Finally, the announced the availability of a “War Tax Resistance Seminar” video, featuring speaker Willard Swartley and panelists Kenneth Covelens, Maynard Shirk, Frank Albrecht (the last two were specifically identified as war tax resisters).


The hows and whys of war tax resistance continued in the pages of the Messenger in , as Cliff Kindy made the case for voluntarily simplicity and living on an income below the tax line.

Messenger: Church of the Brethren

In the Messenger printed an opinion piece by Barry Shutt that had attacked war tax resistance on the grounds that it was ineffective. This somewhat novel argument prompted some rebuttals in the issue (source). L. William Yolton (of the National Interreligious Service Board for Conscientious Objectors) wrote that Shutt’s arguments were of the same sort that conscientious objectors to military service hear — 

“Are there not other evils to be resisted? So don’t resist this one.” “There are differences of opinion among Christians about an issue, so let us wait to do the good until all are agreed.” “If you do not do this evil, then someone else will be drafted in your place to do it, so you must do evil.”

 — and Brethren know by now not to bend to such arguments. David W. Fouts said that his own experience was proof that writing protest letters was a poor form of witness compared to resistance:

For years I enclosed a carefully composed letter with my tax return protesting the use of my tax dollars for military purposes, but I have yet to receive a single reply from an IRS or other administrative official. My actions apparently spoke louder than my words.

However, when I withheld 10 percent of my income taxes to protest the proportion spent on nuclear weapons, I received repeated attention from the IRS in the form of letters demanding payment and threatening to confiscate my property.

Cliff Kindy wrote in for the issue to recommend a non-disobedient form of tax refusal (source).

It has been good to see the issue of paying taxes for war highlighted in Messenger. The issue for our family has been “Who is Lord?” Is Caesar Lord, through the channels of IRS? Or is Jesus? Caesar calls for our money and our life, and, yet, Jesus calls for our all. To which will we respond in obedience? (We cannot have two masters.) We fret about the consequences of breaking the law, and yet seem unconcerned about the possibility of falling into the hands of the living God (Heb. 10:31). Certainly God, who asks us to stand over against the powers of death, will care for us in our obedience. We must venture obedience.

It is too easy to assume that in this instance obedience to God leads directly to disobedience to Caesar. For those who struggle over that concern, there is a possible answer. To limit one’s income to below the taxable level is not illegal, and, although still extravagant by the world’s standards, is moving in the direction of standing with God’s little people. We as a church have not examined seriously the results of living at an income level that does not require missiles, bombers, and Trident submarines to protect it. You might like to try it for a few years.

Several questions for those who pay taxes for war: 1) Do you give more money to the church than you pay to IRS? More than you pay to IRS for the 50-to-70-percent portion of your tax that is military-related? 2) How large would that military-related percentage need to get before you would say “No”? 3) If that percentage of the federal income tax were going to finance houses of prostitution or liquor warehouses, would you pay it? 4) If it would be proper for a Christian to channel monies to the Peace Tax Fund (if such a proposal is ever passed for conscientious objectors), does that not imply that we should feel some urgency even now to pay those dollars toward similar purposes? (Does the law of the land ever define the Law of God?) 5) If we spoke the passages of Matthew 22:21, Mark 12:17, and Luke 20:25 with the same emphasis Jesus probably had, (“Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s”), might we not also find “…this man… forbidding us to give tribute to Caesar…” (Luke 23:2)?

The following news came from the issue:

Kalamazoo Christians make tax-day peace witness

Ten Christians in Kalamazoo, Mich., gathered in front of the courthouse to voice their opposition to military funding. Representing the Catholic Church, the Mennonite Church, and the Church of the Brethren, they withheld a total of $6,400, the portion of their income taxes that they claimed would help fund the military budget.

Deanna Brown, pastor of the Skyridge Church of the Brethren, thought twice before joining the peace demonstration, since she didn’t want to be misunderstood by other Christians. “But because of my vocation as a disciple of Christ,” she said, “I feel called to make this witness and to say there is another way — the way of reconciliation, humility, service — and that’s the way of Jesus Christ.”

Added Steve Senesi: “We are not opposed to taxes. The point today is to speak to where those funds go and how they are spent.” The withheld tax money was given to five local social service agencies: Center City Housing, Loaves and Fishes (a clearinghouse for emergency food pantries), Habitat for Humanity, Kalamazoo Diaconal Conference, and Kalamazoo Youth Ministry.

about ten people stand in a circle on the sidewalk, one holding a banner reading “truth + justice + freedom + love = peace” while in the foreground is a mailbox labeled “Federal and State Income Tax Returns”

“Deanna Brown and Terry Ciszek (to left of banner), of the Kalamazoo Church of the Brethren, joined others who were opposing the use of tax dollars for military purposes.”

The issue brought news of Brethren who had been arrested in demonstrations opposing U.S. militarized foreign policy (source), including:

Phil Rieman, co-pastor of the Ivester church in Grundy Center, Iowa, was part of an effort to link the payment of tax dollars and US funding of the contras [Nicaraguan insurgents]. He and 10 others were arrested after refusing to leave the IRS building in Waterloo.

In the subsequent 2-day jury trial all 11 defendants were found “not guilty” by all six jurors on the grounds that the demonstration was justifiable. “Unlike the recent sanctuary trial (in Tuscon, Ariz.), we were allowed to say why we did what we did. And the jury agreed that we were right,” Rieman said. “It was unusual.”

The previous year, the Messenger had hosted a thoughtful theological debate about the possible biblical basis for tax resistance or obedience. Mark Wilhelm wanted to remind people that this wasn’t just a theoretical concern:

Tax resistance is crucial now

A few Brethren have been discussing war tax resistance, trying to attain a New Testament view. The theological complications of this discussion and the possibility of confrontation with the government have resulted in the neglect of the issue by the majority of Brethren, even those who otherwise adhere to the nonviolent teachings of Jesus. Instead of neglect, we Brethren should urgently consider our position on war-tax resistance.

We Brethren are failing to realize that the military is depending more on technology and less on people. It is this growing dependence on technology that makes the war-tax issue vital. The military is always seeking to use fewer personnel with sophisticated weaponry to carry out major operations. The military goal of this latter work is to replace human soldiers in the battlefield with computer-controlled robotics that are capable of making complex human-like decisions.

Greater military dependence upon advanced technology has its drawbacks. It requires expert scientific research, extensive engineering design, skilled manufacturing, and elaborate testing. This extremely costly work must be begun many years in advance of the intended use of the weapons. Therefore the military needs a large amount of money, and it needs it today for the next decade’s weapons.

It is this shift in the military’s dependence from human soldiers to expensive, advanced-planned technology that makes the payment of war taxes a vital issue to Brethren. The military is less in need of Brethren young men, but more in need of the war taxes paid by all Brethren well before the occurrence of a war. War-tax resistance not only withholds the funding that the military relies upon, it also exposes the sin of the quiet, deadly weapons buildup. War-tax resistance is therefore a vital part of a holistic peace witness.

To be conscientiously opposed to war and to pay for the advanced weaponry that is the life blood of the modern military is a difficult discipleship dilemma, the resolution of which is made increasingly urgent by the pace of technology. To wait until global hostilities begin to practice nonviolent resistance is of no use. At that time the weapons systems that we currently fund will be in the hands of those committed to using them.

At this moment our incomes are being taxed to fight future wars. The income of every brother and sister is being conscripted by the military that it might do tremendous violence. The crucial question each of us must face is: “Would Jesus have me resist this evil?”