How you can resist funding the government → about the IRS and U.S. tax law/policy → IRS incompetence → enforcement effort/results

IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson gave us some idea of how audit targeting has changed in recent years (at washingtonpost.com, which requires free registration to view articles):

IRS figures show that 0.65 percent of all individual taxpayers — roughly one in 150 — were audited in , up from 0.57 percent the year before. The audit rate among taxpayers with incomes of $100,000 or more rose to 1.06 percent from 0.86 percent. In , by contrast, the overall audit rate for individuals was 1.67 percent, and that for high-income taxpayers was 3.21 percent.…

The agency also pointed to a more than 9 percent jump — to $35.5 billion — in money collected from taxpayers as a result of enforcement efforts. The amount had been nearly flat at about $32 billion for .

At the same time, Everson said, IRS surveys indicate that the number of Americans who “believe it is okay to cheat on their taxes,” had risen to 17 percent , from 11 percent in .…

Much of the recent rise in audits was among what the IRS calls correspondence audits, in which the agency writes a letter to a taxpayer asking him or her to justify something on the return, such as the amount of mortgage interest deducted. “Field” audits, in which the taxpayer meets face to face with an IRS employee, climbed slightly to 206,457 in from 205,134 . In , there were 761,850 field audits, according to agency figures.…

The IRS figures also noted a continuing upturn in the number of levies, liens and seizures — key collection tools whose use fell drastically in the wake of Senate Finance Committee hearings in that were highly critical of the agency and resulted in enactment of the reform law.

As with audits, though, all three remained far below levels of the . Seizures of taxpayer property declined the most: 399 compared with 10,449 in .

An Associated Press article adds:

Audits of the nation’s largest corporations, nevertheless, fell for . About 12 percent of corporations with assets exceeding $10 million were audited, compared with more than 14 percent . Audits for small and midsize businesses also dropped slightly.


IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson was interviewed by USA Today, and the interview is in ’s paper. Observe in this excerpt how Everson decries the degradation of ethics and fairness and the culture of greed and materialism that contributed to more people being unwilling to help the IRS take their money from them:

Q: You’ve noted that a survey showed that 11% of the public thought it was OK to cheat on taxes, and now that is up to 17%. What is the driving force behind this attitude?

A: It’s probably two things. One is a degradation of ethics with some practitioners. It was tied to this same spirit of what many called “the culture of greed and materialism” that developed during . But the IRS backed away from enforcing the law as this was happening. It’s a basic sense of fairness. Somebody out there is complying with the law, and they see others doing things, and over time, they feel like chumps. But we will change those attitudes.


The issue of NWTRCC’s newsletter, More Than a Paycheck, is out. It includes:

  • The reports from the 12th International Conference on War Tax Resistance and Peace Tax Campaigns from Ruth Benn and Ed Hedemann that I linked to .
  • Clare Hanrahan’s review of We Won’t Pay: A Tax Resistance Reader:

    “both daunting and encouraging and well worth the considerable reading time… captures in one indexed volume many individual acts and campaigns of conscientious objection to war and of revenue refusal to tyrannical governments… sincere voices and challenging arguments.”

  • Elizabeth Boardman’s review of American Quaker War Tax Resistance:

    “167 intelligent and intense writings on the challenging question of whether people of conscience should pay for war… People struggling with this moral issue today will be guided by the writings in this book and may find some wonderful language to use in their own statements of conscience… a straightforward and compelling book.”

  • Some notes on frivolous filing warnings, new tax laws, and IRS enforcement techniques.
  • Notes about tax resisters Bob Williams, Mike Palecek, and David Schenck, about the trial of two Los Alamos National Laboratory protesters, and about the upcoming New England Regional Gathering of War Tax Resisters and Supporters.
  • A story about long-time resister Thomas Wilson. The state of Massachusetts suspended his dental license 21 years ago when he stopped cooperating with state tax laws because the state, in turn, was acting as a collection agency for the IRS. Wilson kept practicing dentistry without a license, and was able to keep doing so until this year when he was forced to shut down after a competing dentist ratted him out to the state board of registration.

    At 75 Tom is philosophical about closing the door on his professional life and has no regrets about his choices. “In this present economy we’re getting a payback for what the government has been doing and what I haven’t been paying for and resisting all this time. People ask if war tax resistance changes anything. I can’t say that, but it’s helped me put up with what we have to put up with in this country.”


reports and media mentions of war tax resistance are coming in from across the country:

And in other news:


In what has now become an expected routine, the IRS has responded to my failure to include a check with my last tax return by sending me one of their “Notice of intent to seize (‘levy’) your state tax refund [I should be so lucky] or other property.” With $59.32 in penalties and $16.60 in interest, the grand total for is a little north of $6,000.

This came along with some explanations of how they calculate penalties & interest, some pleas to pay up, and a couple of additional inserts: “Notice of Potential Third Party Contact” — which is as far as I can tell mostly designed to try to intimidate you into paying by suggesting that the IRS will send agents around to “your neighbor, bank, employer, or employees” to spread the word that you’re behind on your taxes — and “The IRS Collection Process (Publication 594).”

Luckily for me, IRS audits and other key enforcement programs ‘will operate well below historical levels’ , the federal tax agency’s chief told Congress .”

IRS estimates show “the government will lose almost $3 billion as a result.”


Some bits and pieces from here and there:

  • In , you can attend an on-line “google hangout” on the subject of “War Resistance: Beyond the Rally,” sponsored by the National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee, the Center on Conscience and War, and the National Campaign for a Peace Tax Fund.
  • Boris Yakubchik, an activist in the “effective altruism” movement has published some of his recommendations on frugal living — things he puts into practice so that he’ll have more money to be able to give away to good causes.
  • In the U.S., a person who pays alimony can take it as a tax deduction; a person who receives alimony must declare it as income; and to take the deduction, the payer must include the taxpayer identification number of the recipient on their tax return. You’d think this would make it easy for the IRS to make sure that the numbers match up, and that people aren’t taking phony deductions for fictitious alimony, or failing to report alimony received as income. But according to a new TIGTA report, fully 47% of the alimony deductions do not have corresponding alimony income shown on the recipients return — amounting to “more than $2.3 billion in deductions claimed without corresponding income reported”. Peter J. Reilly dug a little deeper and found that the IRS only bothered to audit 4% of the pairs of returns showing discrepancies — that is to say, “you and your ex collectively have a 96% chance of getting away with something that is in your face blatantly wrong even though you are, in effect, ratting yourselves out.” He calls this “a scandal of epic proportions” and suggests that it’s going to encourage divorcing couples and tax advisors to game the system.
  • How can the current U.S. tax system cope with bitcoins and other aspects of the emerging virtual economy? That’s the subject of a new paper: A Whole New World: Income Tax Considerations of the Bitcoin Economy. Excerpt:

    Because these bitcoins can, in some circumstances, be used to purchase goods or services with a monetary value or where they can be converted to legal tender, the proper income tax treatment of bitcoin transactions presents both compliance and substantive questions for the IRS. …This article explores the current state of the law as it relates to bitcoins as well as proposed methods for applying existing federal income tax laws to the virtual economy.

  • Hey, look: another IRS building temporarily evacuated when a worker opens a package containing a suspicious substance.

And now, a bit of domestic tax resistance news:


While I’ve been studying my Aristotle, links have been piling up in my bookmarks. Here are some of them:


There’s a new National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee newsletter out, with content including:

In other news:


In other news…

  • The Pacifist, a documentary about war tax resister Larry Bassett, has now been released and is viewable on Amazon’s streaming service.
  • Peter J. Reilly looks at the latest report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration and concludes that complying with the tax law has become a sucker’s game. He notes for example the hundreds of thousands of cases where gig economy workers received 1099-K forms indicating they had earned income, but filed no corresponding schedule C forms reporting that income — and how few examples of this obvious discrepancy the IRS bothered to follow up on. He sees the same pattern in cases where one ex-spouse declares an alimony deduction but the other does not declare the alimony as income. And even in the case of crazy “show me the law” tax refusers, the IRS seems to lack the resources or the willpower to pursue them.
  • At National Review, Daniel J. Pilla tries to dig past the initial hype about anti-abortion tax resister Michael Bowman’s recent court victories to discern what that really adds up to from a legal point of view and what implications this has for other conscientious objectors to tax-funded activities.
  • The worldwide epidemic of speed camera destruction continues. TheNewspaper.com has tracked down several recent examples from France, Luxemborg, England, and Italy.

In other news:

  • One of the tools the IRS uses against tax scofflaws like myself is to file a federal tax lien in the local court system of the scofflaw. This puts creditors and the local legal system on notice that the IRS intends to step in and assert its rights to seize money. This can make it difficult to get credit, and also makes it easier for the feds to seize anything awarded by the courts in lawsuits, probate resolution, etc. However (and this is where it gets interesting and newsworthy), filing a lien costs money. And the IRS thinks several California counties are charging them too much, and so they have started to refuse to pay. In response, some counties are refusing to process the IRS liens. Alas, this filing fee, and the standoff between the bureaucracies, also applies to paperwork to release a previously-filed lien. So this doesn’t always work in the scofflaw’s favor. Here’s some news coverage:
  • War tax resister Larry Bassett was interviewed on the Parallax Views podcast. Bassett is the subject of the recent documentary film The Pacifist and is responsible for the largest known individual act of war tax resistance, in terms of the amount of dollars resisted at once.
  • Another Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration report points out that reduced IRS resources means collapsing tax enforcement capability. “As more taxpayers experience little to no consequences for non-filing, the long-term impacts may include potential erosion of the voluntary compliance rate.”
  • Via a review by Ariel Jurow Kleiman of Marjorie E. Kornhauser’s American Voices in a Changing Democracy: Women, Lobbying, and Tax 1924–1936, I learned of a “Meat Strike” meant to protest New Deal-era taxes on meat processing by boycotting meat purchases. The offensive tax was eventually thrown out as unconstitutional.
  • The IRS issued an update to its estimate of the “tax gap” (the difference between how much tax people are supposed to pay and how much they do pay). The upshot is that they think little has changed: people pay about 84% of what the agency believes they owe. However, the last time I looked at the details of one of these “tax gap” reports, I noticed a lot of hand-waving, guesswork, and extrapolation, and only a little empirical data collection, so I would recommend taking these numbers with a grain of salt.
  • More attacks on traffic ticket issuing radar cameras — in France & Italy; Mexico, Germany, and France; and France again. Revenue from the cameras is only half of what the government had hoped for and budgeted for in France this year, and the government has had to divert some of that money to installing more heavily-fortified cameras.
  • The simple home of war tax resistance legends Juanita & Wally Nelson in Deerfield, Massachusetts has been restored as a “living memorial” to the inspirational couple.
  • The 15th International Conference on War Tax Resistance and Peace Tax Campaigns will be held in Edinburgh. The last such conference was held in in Bogotá, Colombia.