Caroline Urie Refuses to Pay War Taxes

Here is a more extensive version of an article on Caroline Urie’s war tax resistance that I first noted :

Won’t Support Military With Income Tax

Navy Officer’s Widow Pays 65.4 Per Cent; Figures Rest Slated For War Purposes

A white-haired widow of a career naval officer challenged the government’s right to tax her for military expenses.

Mrs. Caroline Urie figured that 34.6 per cent of her tax — due  — was earmarked for war.

So, she explained, she wrote a letter to President Truman and the internal revenue department advising she would pay only 65.4 [percent] of the tax.

“If they want to send me to jail because I won’t pay the other 34.6 per cent, that’s all right with me,” she said. “I’m perfectly willing to go to jail. I’ll never pay any more money for war.”

Mrs. Urie, a Quaker, a Pacifist and a social worker,” [sic] worked with Jane Adams at Chicago’s famed Hull house and was director of the school for immigrant children for five years. She wrote Mr. Truman and internal revenue officials:

“As a Christian, I must henceforth refuse to contribute in any way to maintaining the institution of war.”

Besides, she added, the atomic bomb has made war a “final criminal absurdity.”

Mrs. Urie doesn’t want people to get the impression she’s dodging that “war tax.” She mailed 34.6 per cent of her tax to four Pacifist organizations — “every one of them non-profit” — and sent receipts for her contributions with the tax return.

Mrs. Urie, who refused to give her age (“just call me a white-haired widow — a very aged widow at that”), admitted she and her late husband often disagreed on her military views.

“For years I used to send a note along with my federal income tax return protesting expenditures for the military,” she explained. “But my husband and I agreed to tolerate each other’s views on the subject.”

Her husband was a medical officer in the navy “for many, many years.” He was retired before World war Ⅱ, she said, because of injuries suffered in a target practice explosion on a battleship.

She had a son-in-law in the army during World war Ⅱ.

“He doesn’t agree with me either,” she laughed.

Mrs. Urie said she has nothing against paying taxes “for any reasonable constructive purposes — like schools, police protection,” and the like.

“The government won’t lose much in war taxes from me because I have small independent means — and live in a rented house,” she said. “It’s the principle that’s important to me. Obediance to governmental authority can not be unlimited.”

browse«»
Find Out More!

For more information on the topic or topics below (organized as “topic → subtopic → sub-subtopic”), click on any of the ♦ symbols to see other pages on this site that cover the topic. Or browse the site’s topic index at the “Outline” page.